TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.

Fact Check: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.

June 13, 2025•by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period la...

Fact Check: "The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year."

What We Know

The claim states that the removal of cattle was a direct response to a reported 56% increase in deforestation in the Amazon during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. A recent article from the Washington Times confirms this assertion, noting that the cattle removal was indeed linked to this significant rise in deforestation rates.

Deforestation in the Amazon has been a critical issue, with various studies indicating that cattle ranching is a major driver of this environmental crisis. According to the Wikipedia entry on deforestation of the Amazon rainforest, cattle ranching accounts for about 80% of deforestation in the region. The article also highlights that 2024 was noted as the worst year on record for deforestation, which sets a concerning backdrop for the reported surge in 2025.

Analysis

The source of the claim, the Washington Times, is a well-known publication, but it has been criticized for its political bias, which may affect how environmental issues are reported. However, the data it presents aligns with broader findings in environmental research. The claim about the 56% increase in deforestation is corroborated by the context of ongoing deforestation trends in the Amazon, as outlined in the Wikipedia article and the broader discussions on deforestation in the Amazon basin.

While the Washington Times provides a specific figure, it is crucial to consider the reliability of the data sources behind this figure. The claim does not specify the methodology used to calculate the 56% increase, which raises questions about its accuracy. Additionally, the broader context of deforestation trends, including the impact of government policies and international pressures, is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the situation.

The Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook does not provide specific data on deforestation rates but discusses trends in beef production, which can be indirectly related to deforestation rates. The lack of direct evidence from this source makes it difficult to fully validate the claim.

Conclusion

Needs Research: While the claim about the cattle removal in response to a 56% surge in deforestation is supported by a credible source, the lack of detailed methodology and potential biases in reporting necessitate further investigation. More comprehensive data from multiple sources would be needed to confirm the accuracy of the deforestation figure and its direct correlation to cattle removal efforts.

Sources

  1. Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: June 2024
  2. Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest
  3. Deforestation
  4. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon could be halved by scaling up the ...
  5. PDF Companies profit, forests fall: everyone pays the price
  6. Removal of hundreds of illegal cattle in the Amazon sparks ...
  7. Afforestation: Replacing livestock emissions with carbon sequestration
  8. PDF The Deforestation - Global Canopy

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The cattle removal came in response to a 56% surge in deforestation during the first five months of 2025 compared to the same period last year.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The extent to which rubber and Brazil nuts can provide for people is really limited compared to cattle.
Partially True

Fact Check: The extent to which rubber and Brazil nuts can provide for people is really limited compared to cattle.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The extent to which rubber and Brazil nuts can provide for people is really limited compared to cattle.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: On July 20, 2025, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Senator Padilla of childish behavior following his removal from the news conference.
False

Fact Check: On July 20, 2025, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Senator Padilla of childish behavior following his removal from the news conference.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: On July 20, 2025, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Senator Padilla of childish behavior following his removal from the news conference.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The removal operation started last week in one of the country’s most renowned Amazon conservation units, the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve.
True

Fact Check: The removal operation started last week in one of the country’s most renowned Amazon conservation units, the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The removal operation started last week in one of the country’s most renowned Amazon conservation units, the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks