TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The case was brought by three families with trans youth who disputed Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.

Fact Check: The case was brought by three families with trans youth who disputed Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.

Published June 13, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The case was brought by three families with trans youth who disputed Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors." ## What We ...

Fact Check: "The case was brought by three families with trans youth who disputed Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors."

What We Know

The claim that three families with transgender youth brought a case against Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care is accurate. According to a report by the Associated Press, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit challenging Tennessee's law, which prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender-affirming care. This lawsuit was initiated after three transgender children and their parents sued the state, asserting that the law violates the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause by discriminating against transgender youth while allowing similar treatments for other medical conditions (AP News).

The law, signed by Republican Governor Bill Lee, was part of a broader legislative agenda targeting LGBTQ+ rights in Tennessee. It prohibits doctors from prescribing puberty blockers or hormones to minors and includes limited exceptions for those already receiving treatment before the law's enactment (NPR).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust and comes from multiple credible sources. The Associated Press article details the lawsuit filed by the families, clearly stating that they are challenging the ban on behalf of their transgender children. The report emphasizes the legal argument that the ban discriminates against transgender youth, which is a central point of contention in the case (AP News).

Additionally, NPR corroborates this information by discussing the implications of the law and the ongoing legal battles surrounding it. The NPR report highlights the experiences of one of the plaintiffs, a 15-year-old transgender girl, and her family's struggles due to the ban, further validating the claim that families are actively disputing the law (NPR).

The sources used are reputable news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. The Associated Press is a well-established news agency, and NPR is a respected public radio network. Both have a history of reporting on LGBTQ+ issues and legal matters, which adds to their credibility.

Conclusion

The claim that three families with transgender youth brought a case against Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors is True. The evidence from multiple reliable sources confirms that these families are indeed challenging the law, arguing that it discriminates against their children based on their transgender status.

Sources

  1. US sues Tennessee over ban on care for transgender youth
  2. Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors takes effect ... - NPR
  3. Battle over rights of trans children is up at the Supreme Court
  4. Supreme Court Hears Case on Youth Transgender Care
  5. Supreme Court will weigh Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care
  6. Tennessee's gender affirming care ban for children goes to ...
  7. What to Know Ahead of the Supreme Court Case on Youth ...
  8. Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for minors can take effect | CNN

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's supporters do not care about the Epstein case.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's supporters do not care about the Epstein case.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's supporters do not care about the Epstein case.

Jul 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.
True

Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz says he has personally "seen the entire list" of individuals in the Epstein case, and thatitis being deliberately suppressed to protect certain powerful figures.
True

Fact Check: Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz says he has personally "seen the entire list" of individuals in the Epstein case, and thatitis being deliberately suppressed to protect certain powerful figures.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz says he has personally "seen the entire list" of individuals in the Epstein case, and thatitis being deliberately suppressed to protect certain powerful figures.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There is no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials in the Epstein case.
True

Fact Check: There is no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials in the Epstein case.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials in the Epstein case.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks