Fact Check: The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out.

Fact Check: The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out.

Published June 14, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out." ## What We Know In January 2023, David Gay filed a defamation...

Fact Check: "The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out."

What We Know

In January 2023, David Gay filed a defamation lawsuit against Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey, claiming that he was wrongfully featured on Ivey's "Wheel of Fugitive" social media show despite not being a fugitive at the time. Gay alleged that the appearances on the show damaged his reputation and caused him to lose a job, leading to anxiety and depression (Washington Post). The lawsuit was based on the premise that Ivey's show included individuals who were either incarcerated or had no active arrest warrants, which Gay argued was misleading.

On August 27, 2024, a judge from Okeechobee County dismissed the defamation lawsuit against Sheriff Ivey. The ruling cited a previous Florida appellate court decision that grants public officials "absolute immunity" for statements made in the course of their official duties, regardless of whether those statements are false or malicious (Florida Today). This dismissal was made with prejudice, meaning that Gay cannot refile the same claims in the future.

Analysis

The dismissal of the defamation case against Sheriff Ivey is indeed accurate. The ruling was based on established legal precedents that protect public officials from defamation claims related to their official duties. This legal protection is intended to allow officials to perform their roles without the fear of personal liability for statements made in the course of their work (Yahoo News).

Critics of this immunity argue that it can lead to abuses of power, allowing officials to make potentially harmful statements without accountability. Gay's attorney expressed concerns about the implications of this ruling, suggesting that it could discourage citizens from seeking justice against public officials (Florida Today). The case illustrates the tension between the need for public officials to communicate effectively with the public and the rights of individuals to protect their reputations.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including major news outlets and legal commentary, which provide a comprehensive view of the case and its implications.

Conclusion

The claim that "the case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out" is True. The judge's ruling was based on the principle of absolute immunity for public officials, which prevents defamation lawsuits related to their official duties. This legal framework, while controversial, is designed to protect the ability of officials to perform their roles without fear of personal repercussions.

Sources

  1. Florida sheriff sued over mock 'Wheel of Fugitive' game show
  2. Judge tosses 'Wheel of Fugitive' defamation case against ...
  3. Judge throws out 'Wheel of Fugitive' defamation case ...
  4. Immune while in uniform
  5. Judge Dismisses Wheel of Fugitive Defamation Lawsuit ...
  6. Brevard Sheriff Wayne Ivey sued for 'Wheel of Fugitive ...
  7. "Wheel of Fugitive" videos from Brevard County sheriff at ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A few months ago, Piers pledged to pay her almost $150,000 if the defamation case filed by Brigitte Macron against the «trans-accusers» didn’t prove their conspiracy theories false.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: We have 50 years of
data that tells us what
corporations do with tax cuts.
This has been one of the most
studied things by universities
around the world for the last
50 years. And in the last 50
years across 18 of the
wealthiest nations in the world
not one has corporate tax cuts
equated to higher job growth.
00:35
Not once. Or we can just look
at the Trump tax cuts passed in
twenty 17. Donald Trump created
40, 000 less jobs a month than
Barack Obama did. And oh by the
way that's leaving out COVID.
That's leaving out all the job
losses from the pandemic. There
is one thing that happens when
you give corporations big tax
breaks. This right here. 50
years of data. You see that red
line on top? That's the rich
getting richer. You see those
two lines on the bottom? That's
the bottom 905percent? No In
01:06
twenty 18 corporations spent
over a trillion dollars on
stock buybacks and created less
jobs than they did in twenty
fourteen, 15, 16, and
seventeen. You see the rich can
afford to pump all of this
misinformation into your brain.
And that's why you believe it.
There's not a single case in
history of tax cuts for the
rich helping an economy in any
way shape or form.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: We have 50 years of data that tells us what corporations do with tax cuts. This has been one of the most studied things by universities around the world for the last 50 years. And in the last 50 years across 18 of the wealthiest nations in the world not one has corporate tax cuts equated to higher job growth. 00:35 Not once. Or we can just look at the Trump tax cuts passed in twenty 17. Donald Trump created 40, 000 less jobs a month than Barack Obama did. And oh by the way that's leaving out COVID. That's leaving out all the job losses from the pandemic. There is one thing that happens when you give corporations big tax breaks. This right here. 50 years of data. You see that red line on top? That's the rich getting richer. You see those two lines on the bottom? That's the bottom 905percent? No In 01:06 twenty 18 corporations spent over a trillion dollars on stock buybacks and created less jobs than they did in twenty fourteen, 15, 16, and seventeen. You see the rich can afford to pump all of this misinformation into your brain. And that's why you believe it. There's not a single case in history of tax cuts for the rich helping an economy in any way shape or form.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Bringing a case against a Democrat in D.C. is almost a fool's errand.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bringing a case against a Democrat in D.C. is almost a fool's errand.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bringing a case against a Democrat in D.C. is almost a fool's errand.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.
True

Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz says he has personally "seen the entire list" of individuals in the Epstein case, and thatitis being deliberately suppressed to protect certain powerful figures.
True

Fact Check: Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz says he has personally "seen the entire list" of individuals in the Epstein case, and thatitis being deliberately suppressed to protect certain powerful figures.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Former Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz says he has personally "seen the entire list" of individuals in the Epstein case, and thatitis being deliberately suppressed to protect certain powerful figures.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There is no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials in the Epstein case.
True

Fact Check: There is no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials in the Epstein case.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials in the Epstein case.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →