Fact Check: The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out.

Fact Check: The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out.

June 14, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out." ## What We Know In January 2023, David Gay filed a defamation...

Fact Check: "The case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out."

What We Know

In January 2023, David Gay filed a defamation lawsuit against Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey, claiming that he was wrongfully featured on Ivey's "Wheel of Fugitive" social media show despite not being a fugitive at the time. Gay alleged that the appearances on the show damaged his reputation and caused him to lose a job, leading to anxiety and depression (Washington Post). The lawsuit was based on the premise that Ivey's show included individuals who were either incarcerated or had no active arrest warrants, which Gay argued was misleading.

On August 27, 2024, a judge from Okeechobee County dismissed the defamation lawsuit against Sheriff Ivey. The ruling cited a previous Florida appellate court decision that grants public officials "absolute immunity" for statements made in the course of their official duties, regardless of whether those statements are false or malicious (Florida Today). This dismissal was made with prejudice, meaning that Gay cannot refile the same claims in the future.

Analysis

The dismissal of the defamation case against Sheriff Ivey is indeed accurate. The ruling was based on established legal precedents that protect public officials from defamation claims related to their official duties. This legal protection is intended to allow officials to perform their roles without the fear of personal liability for statements made in the course of their work (Yahoo News).

Critics of this immunity argue that it can lead to abuses of power, allowing officials to make potentially harmful statements without accountability. Gay's attorney expressed concerns about the implications of this ruling, suggesting that it could discourage citizens from seeking justice against public officials (Florida Today). The case illustrates the tension between the need for public officials to communicate effectively with the public and the rights of individuals to protect their reputations.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including major news outlets and legal commentary, which provide a comprehensive view of the case and its implications.

Conclusion

The claim that "the case against Sheriff Ivey for defamation was eventually thrown out" is True. The judge's ruling was based on the principle of absolute immunity for public officials, which prevents defamation lawsuits related to their official duties. This legal framework, while controversial, is designed to protect the ability of officials to perform their roles without fear of personal repercussions.

Sources

  1. Florida sheriff sued over mock 'Wheel of Fugitive' game show
  2. Judge tosses 'Wheel of Fugitive' defamation case against ...
  3. Judge throws out 'Wheel of Fugitive' defamation case ...
  4. Immune while in uniform
  5. Judge Dismisses Wheel of Fugitive Defamation Lawsuit ...
  6. Brevard Sheriff Wayne Ivey sued for 'Wheel of Fugitive ...
  7. "Wheel of Fugitive" videos from Brevard County sheriff at ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Smartmatic defamation case against Fox News has been decided in Smartmatic's favor.

May 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Fred Brewington, a civil rights attorney representing Elzon Lemus, stated that the stop may have violated constitutional protections and argued it was a clear case of racial profiling.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Fred Brewington, a civil rights attorney representing Elzon Lemus, stated that the stop may have violated constitutional protections and argued it was a clear case of racial profiling.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Fred Brewington, a civil rights attorney representing Elzon Lemus, stated that the stop may have violated constitutional protections and argued it was a clear case of racial profiling.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Civil rights attorney Fred Brewington stated that the stop of Elzon Lemus by ICE agents may have violated constitutional protections and was a clear case of racial profiling.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Civil rights attorney Fred Brewington stated that the stop of Elzon Lemus by ICE agents may have violated constitutional protections and was a clear case of racial profiling.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Civil rights attorney Fred Brewington stated that the stop of Elzon Lemus by ICE agents may have violated constitutional protections and was a clear case of racial profiling.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brewington argues this was a clear case of racial profiling.
True

Fact Check: Brewington argues this was a clear case of racial profiling.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brewington argues this was a clear case of racial profiling.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In March, a U.S. District Court judge in North Carolina dismissed the case, concluding: 'Simply put, no scientist could reasonably conclude there is a causal association between POTS and Gardasil, based on the evidence presented in court.'
True

Fact Check: In March, a U.S. District Court judge in North Carolina dismissed the case, concluding: 'Simply put, no scientist could reasonably conclude there is a causal association between POTS and Gardasil, based on the evidence presented in court.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In March, a U.S. District Court judge in North Carolina dismissed the case, concluding: 'Simply put, no scientist could reasonably conclude there is a causal association between POTS and Gardasil, based on the evidence presented in court.'

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs.
True

Fact Check: The consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The consolidated case reverted to its original name, L.W. v. Skrmetti, after the Trump administration dropped the previous administration’s support for the plaintiffs.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →