Fact Check: The agents threatened Lemus, saying, 'If we don’t get your ID we are going to need to figure out another way to ID you and that may not work out well for you.'

Published June 13, 2025

•By

FactChecker 1.1

VERDICT

Needs Research

# Fact Check: "The agents threatened Lemus, saying, 'If we don’t get your ID we are going to need to figure out another way to ID you and that may not...

Fact Check: "The agents threatened Lemus, saying, 'If we don’t get your ID we are going to need to figure out another way to ID you and that may not work out well for you.'"

What We Know

The claim suggests that agents made a threatening statement to an individual named Lemus regarding identification. This claim is tied to a broader context of immigration enforcement and the actions of agents, possibly from ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Reports indicate that Lemus, a U.S. citizen, was detained by ICE while driving to work, raising questions about the legality and appropriateness of such actions (Independent). However, specific details about the alleged threat made by the agents are not widely reported or corroborated by multiple sources.

Analysis

The primary source for the claim appears to be a single report that has not been substantiated by additional credible sources. The statement attributed to the agents lacks direct quotes from official documentation or reliable eyewitness accounts. The context of Lemus's detention raises significant concerns about the conduct of ICE agents, but without further evidence or corroboration, the specific wording of the threat remains unverified.

The reliability of the sources discussing Lemus's case varies. The Independent article provides a narrative of the incident but does not include direct evidence of the threatening statement. Other sources, such as the Expressions 2025 and SENATE, do not pertain to the claim and do not provide relevant context or information regarding the alleged threat.

Given the lack of corroborating evidence and the reliance on a single report, the claim's credibility is questionable. The absence of multiple sources reporting the same threatening statement further complicates the verification process.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim regarding agents threatening Lemus lacks sufficient corroboration and is primarily based on a single report without direct evidence. Further investigation is necessary to determine the accuracy of the statement and the context surrounding Lemus's detention.

Sources

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results