TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

June 15, 2025•by TruthOrFake AI
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Gua...

Fact Check: "The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California."

What We Know

The claim that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order regarding the control of National Guard troops in California is accurate. On June 12, 2025, the appeals court issued a stay on a ruling from U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer, who had ordered President Donald Trump to return control of approximately 4,000 National Guard troops to California Governor Gavin Newsom. Judge Breyer's ruling stated that Trump's actions were illegal, exceeding his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (AP News, Washington Post). The appeals court's decision to block this order was made to maintain the status quo while the case was further reviewed (New York Times, PBS).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, as multiple reputable sources confirm the appeals court's action. The 9th Circuit's decision to stay Judge Breyer's order was described as a temporary measure pending further review, which is a common judicial practice in cases involving significant legal questions (CNN, ABC News).

Judge Breyer's original ruling criticized the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard troops, asserting that it was an unlawful militarization of Los Angeles in response to protests, and that the federal government should not override state authority in such matters (The Hill). The appeals court's panel, which included judges appointed by both Trump and Biden, did not provide detailed reasoning for their stay, but their action indicates a judicial inclination to carefully consider the implications of federal military involvement in state matters.

The sources used in this analysis are credible and well-established news organizations, which generally adhere to journalistic standards of accuracy and objectivity. However, the political context surrounding the case may introduce some bias in how different outlets report on the implications of the ruling.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order directing President Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California is true. The appeals court's decision to stay the lower court's ruling reflects ongoing legal disputes regarding the authority of the federal government versus state control over National Guard troops, particularly in the context of domestic unrest.

Sources

  1. Appeals court temporarily blocks judge's ruling to return control of ...
  2. Appeals court says Trump can keep California National Guard deployed ...
  3. What's Next for Trump and the National Guard in California After Court ...
  4. Appeals court temporarily blocks judge's ruling to return control of ...
  5. Appeals court pauses ruling requiring Trump to return control of ...
  6. Appeals court delays order blocking Trump National Guard deployment in ...
  7. Appeals court temporarily lifts judge's block on Trump's National Guard ...
  8. Trump can keep California National Guard deployed for now, appeals ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California on June 11, 2025.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California on June 11, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California on June 11, 2025.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.
True

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Mostly False

Fact Check: US President Donald Trump recently expressed optimism about the potential for tariffs to generate substantial revenue, possibly even replacing income tax. In a conversation with Fox Noticias, Trump highlighted the significant financial gains from tariffs, drawing parallels with the late 19th century when the US imposed tariffs and amassed considerable funds. "There is a chance that the money is so great that it could replace" income tax, Trump stated, referencing the period between 1870 and 1913 when tariffs were the primary source of revenue. During this era, the US experienced unprecedented wealth, with Trump noting, "And that's when our nation was relatively the richest. We were the richest." However, Trump acknowledged that any changes to income tax would require Congressional approval, as the legislative body oversees tax policy. Trump's goal is to utilise tariff revenue to support a tax bill that would exempt tips and Social Security from taxation, among other campaign promises. He emphasised the substantial revenue potential, saying, "It could replace the income tax, that's the kind of money". Trump also discussed a historical committee established to manage excess revenue, stating, "And this committee's sole purpose was how to dispose of it, who to give it to, what do we do? And then, brilliantly, in 1913, they went to the income tax system." He further noted that attempts to revive tariffs in the 1930s were unsuccessful, and the Great Depression was incorrectly blamed on tariffs, when in fact, it predated the tariffs. Regarding tariff revenue, Trump said, "Billions and billions of dollars and, hundreds of billions of dollars over a period of a year." He also referenced the significant daily revenue generated from tariffs, stating, "Before I gave a little bit of a pause to lower just a little bit because, you know, it's a transition. You have to be, you have to have a little flexibility. But we were making two billion and three billion dollars a day. We never made money like that." The Trump administration has temporarily halted reciprocal tariffs imposed on nations for 90 days, following Trump's announcement that there would be no pause on tariffs and only negotiations. Meanwhile, the US has imposed 245% tariffs on China, reflecting the ongoing tariff dispute between the two nations.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: US President Donald Trump recently expressed optimism about the potential for tariffs to generate substantial revenue, possibly even replacing income tax. In a conversation with Fox Noticias, Trump highlighted the significant financial gains from tariffs, drawing parallels with the late 19th century when the US imposed tariffs and amassed considerable funds. "There is a chance that the money is so great that it could replace" income tax, Trump stated, referencing the period between 1870 and 1913 when tariffs were the primary source of revenue. During this era, the US experienced unprecedented wealth, with Trump noting, "And that's when our nation was relatively the richest. We were the richest." However, Trump acknowledged that any changes to income tax would require Congressional approval, as the legislative body oversees tax policy. Trump's goal is to utilise tariff revenue to support a tax bill that would exempt tips and Social Security from taxation, among other campaign promises. He emphasised the substantial revenue potential, saying, "It could replace the income tax, that's the kind of money". Trump also discussed a historical committee established to manage excess revenue, stating, "And this committee's sole purpose was how to dispose of it, who to give it to, what do we do? And then, brilliantly, in 1913, they went to the income tax system." He further noted that attempts to revive tariffs in the 1930s were unsuccessful, and the Great Depression was incorrectly blamed on tariffs, when in fact, it predated the tariffs. Regarding tariff revenue, Trump said, "Billions and billions of dollars and, hundreds of billions of dollars over a period of a year." He also referenced the significant daily revenue generated from tariffs, stating, "Before I gave a little bit of a pause to lower just a little bit because, you know, it's a transition. You have to be, you have to have a little flexibility. But we were making two billion and three billion dollars a day. We never made money like that." The Trump administration has temporarily halted reciprocal tariffs imposed on nations for 90 days, following Trump's announcement that there would be no pause on tariffs and only negotiations. Meanwhile, the US has imposed 245% tariffs on China, reflecting the ongoing tariff dispute between the two nations.

Apr 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The 'No Kings' protests were organized to coincide with President Donald Trump's joint military celebration of his 79th birthday and the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army.
True

Fact Check: The 'No Kings' protests were organized to coincide with President Donald Trump's joint military celebration of his 79th birthday and the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The 'No Kings' protests were organized to coincide with President Donald Trump's joint military celebration of his 79th birthday and the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks