Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Fact Check: "The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California."

What We Know

On June 12, 2025, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling that temporarily blocked a federal judge's order requiring President Donald Trump to return control of California National Guard troops to the state. This decision came shortly after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard was illegal, asserting it violated both the Tenth Amendment and exceeded the president's statutory authority (AP News, Washington Post). The appeals court indicated it would hold a hearing on the matter the following Tuesday, effectively maintaining the status quo regarding the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles amidst ongoing protests over immigration raids (NBC News, PBS NewsHour).

Analysis

The ruling from the 9th Circuit is significant as it temporarily overrides a lower court's decision that deemed Trump's actions illegal. Judge Breyer's ruling highlighted that the deployment did not meet the criteria for federal intervention under Title 10, which allows the president to mobilize the National Guard under specific circumstances such as rebellion or invasion (PBS NewsHour). The appeals court's decision to block Breyer's order can be interpreted as an effort to allow the federal government to maintain control over the National Guard while the legal arguments are further examined.

The credibility of the sources reporting on this issue is generally high. Major news outlets like the Associated Press, Washington Post, and NBC News have established reputations for accurate reporting. However, it is essential to note that the political context surrounding this case could influence the framing of the events. For instance, the Trump administration characterized Breyer's ruling as an "extraordinary intrusion" on presidential authority, which reflects a particular political stance (Washington Post, NBC News). Conversely, California Governor Gavin Newsom's administration argued that the deployment escalated tensions and was unnecessary, emphasizing the importance of state rights in this context (AP News).

Conclusion

The claim that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge's order requiring President Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California is True. The appeals court's decision to stay the lower court's ruling indicates a significant legal maneuver that allows the federal government to retain control over the National Guard while the matter is reviewed further.

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.