Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.

Fact Check: "The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California."

What We Know

On Thursday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary stay on a federal judge's ruling that required President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard troops to California Governor Gavin Newsom. This decision followed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer, who found that Trump's deployment of the National Guard was illegal, exceeding his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Washington Post, AP News). The appeals court's order allows the Trump administration to maintain control of the troops while the case is reviewed, with a hearing scheduled for the following Tuesday (BBC, NBC News).

Judge Breyer's ruling stated that the deployment was unlawful and that the continued militarization of Los Angeles could inflame tensions with protesters (Le Monde). The Trump administration characterized the judge's order as an "extraordinary intrusion" on presidential authority, asserting that the deployment was necessary for the protection of federal personnel and property in response to protests (PBS, Yahoo News).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked the federal judge's order is robust. Multiple reputable sources, including the Washington Post, AP News, and BBC, confirm that the appeals court issued a stay on the ruling, allowing the Trump administration to retain control of the National Guard troops for the time being. The appeals court's decision was made shortly before the federal judge's order was set to take effect, indicating a swift response to maintain the status quo.

The reliability of the sources is high, as they include established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. The Washington Post and AP News, in particular, have a long history of accurate reporting on legal and political matters. The information provided is consistent across multiple outlets, reinforcing its credibility.

However, it is important to note that the context surrounding the deployment and the legal arguments presented by both sides are contentious. The Trump administration's framing of the situation as a necessary measure to protect federal interests contrasts sharply with the concerns raised by Governor Newsom and Judge Breyer regarding the militarization of civilian law enforcement and the potential for escalating tensions (NBC News, PBS).

Conclusion

The claim that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order directing President Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California is True. The appeals court's decision to stay the lower court's ruling is well-documented and supported by multiple credible sources, confirming the accuracy of the statement.

Fact Check: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge’s order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California.