TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Teslas are the most recalled car

Fact Check: Teslas are the most recalled car

Published April 9, 2025•
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
Mostly False

# Tesla's Recall Status: An Examination of the Claim "Teslas are the Most Recalled Car" ## Introduction The claim that "Teslas are the most recalled ...

Tesla's Recall Status: An Examination of the Claim "Teslas are the Most Recalled Car"

Introduction

The claim that "Teslas are the most recalled car" has gained traction in discussions surrounding the safety and reliability of Tesla vehicles. This assertion raises questions about the frequency and nature of recalls associated with Tesla compared to other automotive manufacturers. In this article, we will explore the available evidence regarding Tesla's recall history and analyze the credibility of the sources that discuss this claim.

What We Know

  1. Recent Recalls: Tesla has faced significant recall activity in recent years. For instance, in 2023 alone, Tesla recalled nearly 2 million vehicles in the U.S. to address issues related to the Autopilot driver-assistance system 39. Additionally, the company has issued multiple recalls for its newly launched Cybertruck, with reports indicating that it has been recalled eight times in a span of 15 months due to various safety concerns 14.

  2. Scope of Recalls: The recalls cover a wide range of models, including the Model S, Model X, Model 3, and Model Y, with specific issues ranging from software malfunctions to hardware defects 57. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has been involved in overseeing these recalls, which adds a layer of regulatory scrutiny 23.

  3. Comparative Context: While Tesla has had a high number of recalls, it is essential to compare these figures with those of other automakers. For example, in 2023, other manufacturers also reported significant recalls, but specific comparative statistics on total recalls across all manufacturers are not readily available in the sources reviewed 9.

Analysis

The claim that Teslas are the most recalled vehicles is complex and requires careful examination of the data and the sources reporting it.

  • Source Reliability: The sources cited include reputable news organizations such as the Associated Press 3, Reuters 2, and BBC 4, which generally adhere to journalistic standards. However, some sources, such as BRC Legal 6, may have a vested interest in promoting specific narratives about Tesla, which could introduce bias.

  • Methodology Concerns: The methodology for determining the "most recalled" status is not clearly defined in the available sources. For instance, while Tesla's recall numbers are substantial, the context of these recalls (e.g., the total number of vehicles sold, the nature of the recalls, and how they compare to industry averages) is not fully explored. This lack of context makes it difficult to assess the validity of the claim accurately.

  • Conflicting Information: There is a lack of comprehensive data comparing Tesla's recall rates to those of other manufacturers. While Tesla's recalls are notable, other automakers also experience significant recalls, and without comparative data, it is challenging to definitively state that Tesla leads in this regard.

  • Public Perception and Bias: The narrative surrounding Tesla recalls may be influenced by the company's high-profile status and the polarized opinions about its CEO, Elon Musk. This could lead to a perception that Tesla is more frequently recalled than its competitors, regardless of the actual data.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To better evaluate the claim that Teslas are the most recalled cars, it would be beneficial to have:

  • Comprehensive statistics on recalls from all major automotive manufacturers for a specific time frame.
  • Data on the total number of vehicles sold by each manufacturer to contextualize recall figures.
  • Detailed information on the nature and severity of recalls across different brands to assess their impact on consumer safety.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that "Teslas are the most recalled car" is deemed "Mostly False" due to several key factors. While Tesla has indeed experienced a high volume of recalls, particularly in recent years, the lack of comprehensive comparative data makes it difficult to definitively assert that Tesla leads all manufacturers in recall frequency. The evidence indicates that other automakers also face significant recall issues, and without a clear methodology for comparison, the claim lacks sufficient context.

It is important to recognize that the perception of Tesla's recall status may be influenced by media narratives and public opinion, which can skew the understanding of the actual data. Furthermore, the available evidence does not fully account for the total number of vehicles sold by Tesla compared to its competitors, which is crucial for a fair assessment of recall rates.

Readers should remain aware of the limitations in the available evidence and the complexities surrounding automotive recalls. It is advisable to critically evaluate information and consider multiple sources before drawing conclusions about vehicle safety and reliability.

Sources

  1. In latest blow to Tesla, regulators recall nearly all Cybertrucks. Associated Press. Link
  2. Tesla recalls most Cybertrucks due to trim detaching from vehicle. Reuters. Link
  3. Tesla recalls nearly all vehicles sold in US to fix system that ... Associated Press. Link
  4. Elon Musk's Tesla makes largest ever Cybertruck recall. BBC. Link
  5. Tesla recalls 2023: Check full list of car models recalled this year. USA Today. Link
  6. Tesla Recall Statistics [2025]. BRC Legal. Link
  7. 2023 Tesla Model 3 Recalls & Safety Notices. Kelley Blue Book. Link
  8. In latest blow to Tesla, regulators recall nearly all Cybertrucks. ABC Action News. Link
  9. How Many Recalls Has Tesla Faced in 2023? Details Here. Green Matters. Link
  10. Check car recalls: Tesla, Ford among over 120K vehicles recalled. USA Today. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Teslas are the most American made car
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Teslas are the most American made car

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Teslas are the most American made car

Apr 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pushed through a plan to lower the national voting age from 18 to 16 for the next general election, the most sweeping extension of voting rights for over 50 years.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pushed through a plan to lower the national voting age from 18 to 16 for the next general election, the most sweeping extension of voting rights for over 50 years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pushed through a plan to lower the national voting age from 18 to 16 for the next general election, the most sweeping extension of voting rights for over 50 years.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: THE MEXICAN DELEGATION Office of Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Statement Shea Serrano Regarding Eating Arby's For Lunch Today with great and shame that admit to you today, the rumors are true: Regarding lunch, did, in fact, eat Arby's ' embarrassed by this turn of events, but know that have to blame for them but myself. regret my actions deeply, and am actively working now to be better person. apologize to anybody that my actions harmed, most importantly my family, who know 'ν embarrassed. Though certainly do not deserve the grace, you respect my privacy during this very difficult time.
Unverified

Fact Check: THE MEXICAN DELEGATION Office of Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Statement Shea Serrano Regarding Eating Arby's For Lunch Today with great and shame that admit to you today, the rumors are true: Regarding lunch, did, in fact, eat Arby's ' embarrassed by this turn of events, but know that have to blame for them but myself. regret my actions deeply, and am actively working now to be better person. apologize to anybody that my actions harmed, most importantly my family, who know 'ν embarrassed. Though certainly do not deserve the grace, you respect my privacy during this very difficult time.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: THE MEXICAN DELEGATION Office of Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Statement Shea Serrano Regarding Eating Arby's For Lunch Today with great and shame that admit to you today, the rumors are true: Regarding lunch, did, in fact, eat Arby's ' embarrassed by this turn of events, but know that have to blame for them but myself. regret my actions deeply, and am actively working now to be better person. apologize to anybody that my actions harmed, most importantly my family, who know 'ν embarrassed. Though certainly do not deserve the grace, you respect my privacy during this very difficult time.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."
Partially True

Fact Check: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Call "Alligator Alcatraz" what it is: a concentration camp. "Most detainees at the center do not have criminal convictions, according to a government official..."

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Teslas are the most recalled car | TruthOrFake Blog