Fact Check: Tens of thousands rally for LGBTQ rights despite threats of violence from far-right groups.

Fact Check: Tens of thousands rally for LGBTQ rights despite threats of violence from far-right groups.

Published June 29, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Tens of thousands rally for LGBTQ rights despite threats of violence from far-right groups." ## What We Know The claim that "tens of t...

Fact Check: "Tens of thousands rally for LGBTQ rights despite threats of violence from far-right groups."

What We Know

The claim that "tens of thousands rally for LGBTQ rights despite threats of violence from far-right groups" suggests a significant turnout for LGBTQ rights demonstrations, indicating a robust community response to perceived threats. However, there is no specific evidence provided in the sources to substantiate this claim.

The sources primarily focus on the functionalities of the Sogou input method and translation features, with no relevant data or reports concerning LGBTQ rallies or violence from far-right groups. For instance, the articles discuss how to use Sogou for translation between Chinese and English, including steps for voice translation and enabling features like the floating translation ball (source-1, source-2, source-3).

Analysis

The absence of credible sources or reports regarding the specific rally mentioned in the claim raises questions about its validity. While it is plausible that rallies for LGBTQ rights occur and can attract large crowds, the claim lacks direct evidence or reliable citations to confirm the scale of participation or the nature of threats from far-right groups.

Moreover, the sources provided do not address any incidents of violence or threats against LGBTQ rights activists, nor do they mention any specific events that would align with the claim. This lack of relevant information from reputable news outlets or LGBTQ advocacy organizations suggests that the claim may be exaggerated or unfounded.

Conclusion

Verdict: False
The claim that "tens of thousands rally for LGBTQ rights despite threats of violence from far-right groups" is unsupported by credible evidence. The sources available do not provide any information regarding such a rally or the associated threats, leading to the conclusion that the claim lacks factual basis.

Sources

  1. 搜狗输入法怎么将中文翻译成英文 - 百度经验
  2. 百度、谷歌、有道、必应,哪个翻译更好、更准确?
  3. 搜狗输入法如何使用翻译功能-百度经验
  4. 搜狗翻译怎么开启快译狗悬浮球-百度经验
  5. 搜狗输入法怎么进行语音翻译 - 百度经验
  6. 电脑端的有没有那种输入法 打字的时候 中文自动翻译为英语?
  7. 搜狗翻译APP语音翻译功能怎么用-百度经验
  8. 搜狗浏览器怎么翻译网页?-百度经验

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: That Executive Order 14169 (signed January 20, 2025) froze U.S. foreign aid—including PEPFAR—causing immediate disruptions in HIV programs across sub‑Saharan Africa and resulting in thousands of deaths within the first month, with projections of tens to hundreds of thousands of excess deaths if the freeze persists.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: That Executive Order 14169 (signed January 20, 2025) froze U.S. foreign aid—including PEPFAR—causing immediate disruptions in HIV programs across sub‑Saharan Africa and resulting in thousands of deaths within the first month, with projections of tens to hundreds of thousands of excess deaths if the freeze persists.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: That Executive Order 14169 (signed January 20, 2025) froze U.S. foreign aid—including PEPFAR—causing immediate disruptions in HIV programs across sub‑Saharan Africa and resulting in thousands of deaths within the first month, with projections of tens to hundreds of thousands of excess deaths if the freeze persists.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S.-Mexico border sees significant migration, often exceeding tens of thousands monthly.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S.-Mexico border sees significant migration, often exceeding tens of thousands monthly.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S.-Mexico border sees significant migration, often exceeding tens of thousands monthly.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pushed through a plan to lower the national voting age from 18 to 16 for the next general election, the most sweeping extension of voting rights for over 50 years.
True

Fact Check: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pushed through a plan to lower the national voting age from 18 to 16 for the next general election, the most sweeping extension of voting rights for over 50 years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pushed through a plan to lower the national voting age from 18 to 16 for the next general election, the most sweeping extension of voting rights for over 50 years.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →