TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Telsa's full self driving mode is responsible for deaths

Fact Check: Telsa's full self driving mode is responsible for deaths

Published June 1, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Tesla's Full Self-Driving Mode and Its Alleged Link to Fatalities ## Introduction The claim that "Tesla's full self-driving mode is responsible for...

Tesla's Full Self-Driving Mode and Its Alleged Link to Fatalities

Introduction

The claim that "Tesla's full self-driving mode is responsible for deaths" has gained traction as incidents involving Tesla vehicles equipped with this technology have been reported. This assertion raises critical questions about the safety and reliability of Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, particularly in light of ongoing investigations and data regarding accidents.

What We Know

  1. Accident Reports: According to a Wikipedia entry, as of October 2024, there have been several documented incidents involving Tesla's Autopilot and FSD systems that resulted in fatalities. The data indicates that FSD has been implicated in at least two fatal accidents, with some incidents still under investigation to determine the exact role of the technology used at the time of the crashes [1](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tesla_Autopilot_crashes#:~:text=As%20of%20October%202024%2C%20there,of%20Full%20Self%2DDriving%20(FSD).

  2. Federal Investigations: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has opened investigations into Tesla's FSD software, focusing on its involvement in collisions. A report from Reuters notes that the agency is examining over 2.4 million vehicles due to concerns about the FSD system's safety 2.

  3. Statistical Data: A report by Car and Driver highlights that since the introduction of FSD, there has been a rise in crashes involving Tesla vehicles, with NHTSA data showing an increase in injuries and fatalities linked to the use of these driver-assistance technologies 4.

  4. Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny: The Washington Post reported that the NHTSA's data includes instances where it is unclear whether Autopilot or FSD was in operation during crashes, complicating the assessment of responsibility 3. This ambiguity raises questions about the reliability of the data being used to evaluate the safety of these systems.

  5. Public Perception and Criticism: Articles from sources like Forbes and WIRED have raised concerns about the safety of Tesla's FSD, citing incidents where the technology has failed to perform as expected, leading to accidents 79. Critics argue that the system may encourage complacency among drivers, who may over-rely on the technology.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim that Tesla's FSD is responsible for deaths is multifaceted and requires careful examination.

  • Source Reliability: The sources cited vary in credibility. Wikipedia provides a broad overview but may not always be up-to-date or comprehensive. News outlets like Reuters and The Washington Post are generally reliable, as they adhere to journalistic standards, but they may also have editorial biases that could influence their reporting. For instance, The Washington Post has been critical of Tesla in the past, which could color its reporting on this issue 3.

  • Conflicting Information: While some reports indicate that FSD has been involved in fatal accidents, others emphasize the ambiguity of the data, noting that many incidents involve driver misuse or unclear circumstances regarding the technology's operation 39. This discrepancy highlights the need for further investigation to ascertain the true impact of FSD on safety.

  • Methodological Concerns: The methodology used by NHTSA in collecting and analyzing crash data could also be questioned. For example, the classification of incidents as involving FSD or Autopilot can be inconsistent, leading to potential misinterpretations of the data 410.

  • Potential Biases: Some sources, such as Tesla Deaths, focus specifically on accidents involving Tesla vehicles, which may lead to a skewed perspective that emphasizes negative outcomes without providing a broader context of overall vehicle safety 5.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that Tesla's full self-driving mode is responsible for deaths is partially true, as there is evidence indicating that the FSD system has been implicated in fatal accidents. However, the context surrounding these incidents is complex. While there have been documented fatalities involving Tesla's FSD, the exact role of the technology in these accidents remains uncertain due to factors such as driver behavior, the ambiguity of data regarding the operation of FSD at the time of crashes, and ongoing investigations.

Moreover, the evidence is limited and often conflicting, with some reports emphasizing the potential for driver misuse or unclear circumstances surrounding the technology's involvement. This complexity underscores the need for further research and analysis to fully understand the implications of Tesla's FSD on road safety.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the nuances involved in assessing the safety of autonomous driving technologies. The ongoing investigations and evolving data will be crucial in forming a more comprehensive understanding of this issue.

Sources

  1. List of Tesla Autopilot crashes - Wikipedia. Link
  2. US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software in 2.4 mln cars. Reuters. Link
  3. Tesla 'Autopilot' crashes and fatalities surge. The Washington Post. Link
  4. Report: Tesla Autopilot Involved in 736 Crashes since 2019. Car and Driver. Link
  5. Tesla Deaths: Every Tesla Accident Resulting in Death. Tesla Deaths. Link
  6. Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" system faces probe after fatal accident. CBS News. Link
  7. Just How Safe Is Tesla's Full Self-Driving Mode? Forbes. Link
  8. Tesla Autopilot Accidents: Legal Rights & Liability Explained. Team Justice. Link
  9. Tesla Autopilot Was Uniquely Risky—and May Still Be. WIRED. Link
  10. Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving linked to hundreds of accidents. The Verge. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Speaker Mike Johnson publicly supported Ghislaine Maxwell testifying and pushed for full disclosure of Epstein documents, but subsequently orchestrated House recess and blocked floor action to avoid actual votes on releasing the testimony or records.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo
Partially True

Fact Check: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo

Detailed fact-check analysis of: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sunscreen most cancer-causing products alters your hormones and is full of toxins.
Partially True

Fact Check: Sunscreen most cancer-causing products alters your hormones and is full of toxins.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sunscreen most cancer-causing products alters your hormones and is full of toxins.

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: TRump's 2nd term as President is full of lies
Partially True

Fact Check: TRump's 2nd term as President is full of lies

Detailed fact-check analysis of: TRump's 2nd term as President is full of lies

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks