TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Teen member of Musk’s Doge staff provided tech support to cybercrime ring, records show

Fact Check: Teen member of Musk’s Doge staff provided tech support to cybercrime ring, records show

Published March 26, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Teen Member of Musk’s Doge Staff Provided Tech Support to Cybercrime Ring, Records Show ## Introduction A recent claim has emerged suggesting that ...

Teen Member of Musk’s Doge Staff Provided Tech Support to Cybercrime Ring, Records Show

Introduction

A recent claim has emerged suggesting that Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old member of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), provided technical support to a cybercrime gang. Reports indicate that this gang was involved in activities such as trafficking stolen data and cyberstalking an FBI agent. This allegation raises significant questions about the credibility and integrity of individuals associated with high-profile technology initiatives.

What We Know

  1. Identity and Role: Edward Coristine, also known by the moniker "Big Balls," is described as a prominent member of Musk's DOGE team, which has been tasked with government efficiency projects. He reportedly has access to official networks as part of this role 568.

  2. Allegations of Cybercrime Support: Multiple sources, including Reuters and The Guardian, assert that Coristine provided tech support to a cybercrime group that bragged about its illegal activities, including data theft and harassment of law enforcement 1456.

  3. Digital Records: The claims are based on digital records that were reviewed by journalists, although the specifics of these records have not been publicly detailed 134.

  4. Previous Employment: Prior to his involvement with DOGE, Coristine was reportedly fired from a cybersecurity company for leaking sensitive information, which raises further questions about his professional conduct and reliability 9.

Analysis

Source Reliability

  • Reuters: As a well-established news organization, Reuters is generally considered a reliable source. However, it is essential to note that the information presented is based on "digital records reviewed by Reuters," which have not been made publicly accessible for independent verification 14.

  • The Guardian: This outlet is known for its investigative journalism, but like all media, it may have biases depending on the framing of the story. The Guardian's report corroborates the claims made by Reuters, but it also lacks detailed evidence to support the allegations 5.

  • Yahoo News and Other Outlets: Other sources, such as Yahoo News and Cybernews, have echoed the claims made by Reuters and The Guardian, but they do not provide additional context or new evidence, which limits their reliability 368.

Conflicts of Interest

There is no immediate indication of conflicts of interest among the sources cited; however, the sensational nature of the story could lead to biased reporting aimed at attracting readership rather than providing a balanced view.

Methodology and Evidence

The methodology behind the claims relies heavily on the interpretation of digital records. Without access to these records or an understanding of how they were obtained, it is difficult to assess the validity of the claims. The lack of specific details about the nature of the support provided and the extent of Coristine's involvement with the cybercrime group raises further skepticism.

Counterpoints

While the allegations are serious, it is important to consider that Coristine has not been charged with any crime related to these claims. The reports focus on past actions and associations, which may not necessarily reflect his current activities or character.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The allegations surrounding Edward Coristine's involvement with a cybercrime gang remain unverified due to several key factors. The primary evidence cited in reports consists of digital records that have not been made publicly available for independent scrutiny. While reputable sources like Reuters and The Guardian have reported on these claims, the lack of detailed evidence and the reliance on unverified records contribute to the uncertainty of the situation.

Moreover, Coristine has not faced any criminal charges related to these allegations, which adds another layer of complexity to the narrative. The sensational nature of the claims may also influence how they are reported and interpreted, necessitating a cautious approach to their validity.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, as the absence of direct access to the digital records and the lack of specific details regarding Coristine's alleged actions hinder a definitive conclusion. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and remain aware of the potential for bias in reporting on such high-profile cases.

Sources

  1. Reuters. "Exclusive: DOGE staffer 'Big Balls' provided tech support to cybercrime ring, records show." Link
  2. Reuters. "DOGE website offers error-filled window into Musk's government overhaul." Link
  3. Yahoo News. "Exclusive-DOGE staffer, 'Big Balls', provided tech support to cybercrime ring." Link
  4. India Today. "Popular teen DOGE member once provided tech support to cybercrime ring." Link
  5. The Guardian. "Teen member of Musk's Doge staff provided tech support to cybercrime ring." Link
  6. ABP Live. "Elon Musk DOGE Tech Advisor Cybercrime Network Donald Trump." Link
  7. MSN. "DOGE staffer, 'Big Balls', provided tech support to cybercrime ring." Link
  8. Cybernews. "Musk DOGE’s star teen linked to cybercriminals." Link
  9. Gizmodo. "DOGE staffer previously fired from cybersecurity company for leaking." Link
  10. TBS News. "DOGE staffer, 'Big Balls', provided tech support to cybercrime ring." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: are the pictures of Trump on air plane with teen age girls real or photo shopped
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: are the pictures of Trump on air plane with teen age girls real or photo shopped

Detailed fact-check analysis of: are the pictures of Trump on air plane with teen age girls real or photo shopped

Aug 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: United States have highest rate of teen pregnancy rate of high income countries
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: United States have highest rate of teen pregnancy rate of high income countries

Detailed fact-check analysis of: United States have highest rate of teen pregnancy rate of high income countries

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Teen member of Musk’s Doge staff provided tech support to cybercrime ring, records show | TruthOrFake Blog