Fact Check: Taxpayers fund organizations that support violent protests against federal immigration enforcement.

Fact Check: Taxpayers Fund Organizations That Support Violent Protests Against Federal Immigration Enforcement

What We Know

The claim that taxpayers fund organizations that support violent protests against federal immigration enforcement has emerged amid ongoing investigations into various non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Specifically, the House Judiciary Committee is probing the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), which received nearly $1 million in federal grants under the Biden administration. The committee's inquiry raises concerns that these funds may have been used to support activities linked to violent protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Los Angeles (Nesi, 2025) [source-1].

The protests in question turned violent, resulting in significant damage and confrontations with law enforcement. Reports indicate that CHIRLA organized a rally coinciding with these protests but denied any involvement in the violence that ensued (Nesi, 2025) [source-1]. Financial records reveal that CHIRLA has received substantial funding from both federal and state sources, totaling around $34 million in government grants in the fiscal year ending June 2023, a significant increase from the previous year (Nesi, 2025) [source-1].

Analysis

The investigation into CHIRLA and its funding sources is politically charged, with implications that extend beyond the organization itself. The House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican members, is scrutinizing whether taxpayer dollars are being misused to incite violence against federal enforcement agencies (Jordan et al., 2025) [source-2]. While the committee's concerns are based on documented funding and the timing of protests, it is essential to note that CHIRLA has publicly stated that its activities were limited to legal observance and press events, distancing itself from the violent actions attributed to the protests (Nesi, 2025) [source-1].

The reliability of the sources involved in this narrative varies. The House Judiciary Committee's inquiry is an official governmental process, suggesting a level of credibility; however, it is also influenced by political motivations, particularly given the partisan nature of the committee's leadership. In contrast, media reports, such as those from the New York Post and other outlets, may carry biases based on their editorial slants, which could affect the portrayal of CHIRLA and the protests (Nesi, 2025; Christenson, 2025) [source-6].

Moreover, while there is evidence of funding for CHIRLA, the assertion that these funds directly support violent protests remains unproven. The connection between the funding and the violent actions of protestors is speculative at this point, as CHIRLA has denied involvement in any violent activities (Nesi, 2025) [source-1].

Conclusion

The claim that taxpayers fund organizations that support violent protests against federal immigration enforcement is Partially True. There is documented evidence of taxpayer funding to organizations like CHIRLA, which has been linked to protests against ICE. However, the assertion that these funds are being used to incite violence is not conclusively supported by evidence. The organization has distanced itself from the violent actions of protestors, and the ongoing investigations are still in their early stages. Therefore, while there is a basis for concern regarding the use of taxpayer dollars, the direct link to supporting violent protests remains unverified.

Fact Check: Taxpayers fund organizations that support violent protests against federal immigration enforcement.