Fact Check: Taxes in Poland are low and easy

Fact Check: Taxes in Poland are low and easy

Published April 17, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Taxes in Poland: Are They Low and Easy? ## Introduction The claim that "taxes in Poland are low and easy" suggests a favorable view of the Polish t...

Taxes in Poland: Are They Low and Easy?

Introduction

The claim that "taxes in Poland are low and easy" suggests a favorable view of the Polish tax system, implying both low tax rates and a straightforward filing process. This assertion invites scrutiny, as tax experiences can vary significantly based on income levels, types of taxes, and individual circumstances. This article will examine the available evidence regarding tax rates and the complexity of tax filing in Poland.

What We Know

  1. Tax Rates: Poland employs a progressive income tax system. As of 2023, individual income tax rates are set at 12% for lower income brackets and 32% for higher earners, with an option for a flat rate of 19% on business income under certain conditions 238.

  2. Tax Filing: The Polish government has been enhancing digital services for tax filing, which may simplify the process for many taxpayers 1. However, the complexity of tax regulations and the requirement for individuals to file returns can still pose challenges, especially for those unfamiliar with the system 10.

  3. International Comparisons: According to the Tax Foundation, Poland ranks 31st on the International Tax Competitiveness Index, indicating a relatively competitive tax environment compared to other countries 56.

  4. Marital Tax Filing: In Poland, married couples typically file taxes separately, which differs from systems like that of the U.S. where joint filing is common. This separation can affect the overall tax burden for families 8.

  5. Digital Innovations: The Ministry of Finance in Poland is actively working on improving digital tax services, which may enhance the ease of filing for taxpayers 1.

Analysis

The claim that taxes in Poland are "low" can be contested based on the progressive nature of the tax system. While the lower rate of 12% may seem attractive for lower-income individuals, the higher rate of 32% applies to those earning above certain thresholds, which could negate the perception of low taxes for higher earners 23.

The assertion of ease in tax filing is more subjective. The government's efforts to digitize tax services are commendable, but the actual experience can vary widely. For instance, individuals unfamiliar with the tax system may still find the filing process daunting despite digital advancements 10.

The sources used to assess this claim vary in reliability. Government sources, such as the Ministry of Finance, generally provide accurate and up-to-date information 1. However, sources like the Tax Foundation, while reputable, may have a specific agenda to promote lower taxes and could present a biased view of tax competitiveness 56.

Furthermore, the complexity of tax regulations and the requirement for individuals to understand their obligations can complicate the assertion that taxes are "easy." The lack of comprehensive data on taxpayer experiences in Poland limits the ability to fully assess the claim. Additional qualitative research, such as surveys of taxpayers regarding their experiences with the tax system, would provide a clearer picture.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The assertion that "taxes in Poland are low and easy" is partially true. Evidence indicates that while the lower income tax rate of 12% may appeal to some, the higher rate of 32% for higher earners complicates the notion of low taxes overall. Additionally, while the Polish government is making strides in digitalizing tax services, the complexity of the tax regulations and the requirement for individuals to file returns can still present challenges, particularly for those unfamiliar with the system.

It is important to note that the experiences of taxpayers can vary widely, and the subjective nature of what constitutes "easy" can lead to differing opinions. Furthermore, the available evidence is limited, particularly regarding qualitative experiences of taxpayers, which makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the ease of the tax filing process.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding tax systems and consider their own circumstances when assessing claims about tax rates and filing processes.

Sources

  1. 2024 Investment Climate Statements: Poland. U.S. Department of State. https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/poland/
  2. Poland - Individual - Taxes on personal income. PwC. https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/poland/individual/taxes-on-personal-income
  3. Poland Taxes 2023. Worldwide Tax. https://worldwide-tax.com/poland/poland-taxes.asp
  4. Poland Tax Tables 2023. iCalculator. https://pl.icalculator.com/income-tax-rates/2023.html
  5. Poland Tax Rates and Rankings. Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/location/poland/
  6. Taxes In Poland. Tax Foundation. https://taxfoundation.org/location/poland/page/7/
  7. Taxation of international executives: Poland. KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2023/01/TIES-Poland.pdf
  8. Tax Guide For US Expats Living in Poland. CPAs for Expats. https://www.cpasforexpats.com/post/taxes-us-expats-poland
  9. PDF Taxation of international executives: Poland. KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/xx/pdf/2023/01/TIES-Poland.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
  10. Tax Return Filing in Poland: Who Must File and How? Aksis. https://aksis.agency/blog/who-is-obliged-to-file-tax-returns-in-poland-pit-tax-guide

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The wealthy do not flee to avoid higher taxes, contrary to popular belief.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The wealthy do not flee to avoid higher taxes, contrary to popular belief.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The wealthy do not flee to avoid higher taxes, contrary to popular belief.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump lied about social security eliminating taxes
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump lied about social security eliminating taxes

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump lied about social security eliminating taxes

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's tax bill eliminates federal income taxes on social security benefits for most beneficiaries.
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump's tax bill eliminates federal income taxes on social security benefits for most beneficiaries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's tax bill eliminates federal income taxes on social security benefits for most beneficiaries.

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Local property taxes fund the majority of U.S. public schools.
Partially True

Fact Check: Local property taxes fund the majority of U.S. public schools.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Local property taxes fund the majority of U.S. public schools.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Taxes in Poland are low and easy | TruthOrFake Blog