Fact Check: Switzerland lacks CO2 storage facilities but aims for net-zero emissions.

Fact Check: Switzerland lacks CO2 storage facilities but aims for net-zero emissions.

Published June 18, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Switzerland lacks CO2 storage facilities but aims for net-zero emissions." ## What We Know Switzerland has set ambitious climate goals...

Fact Check: "Switzerland lacks CO2 storage facilities but aims for net-zero emissions."

What We Know

Switzerland has set ambitious climate goals, committing to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and to reduce emissions by at least 50% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels (IEA). The Swiss government has introduced various legislative measures to support these targets, including the Climate and Innovation Act, which incorporates carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies as part of its strategy (Carbon Herald).

Despite these commitments, the development of CO2 storage facilities within Switzerland faces significant challenges. The federal government is limited in its ability to develop CO2 transport and storage infrastructure due to the fact that territorial planning is under the jurisdiction of individual cantons (IEA). Currently, there are ongoing projects exploring the potential for CO2 storage, such as a project in Zurich, but these are still in the exploratory phase and have not yet resulted in operational storage facilities (Swissinfo).

Analysis

The claim that Switzerland lacks CO2 storage facilities is accurate. As of now, while there are initiatives to explore CO2 storage options, no large-scale facilities are operational within the country (Swissinfo). This limitation is compounded by the legal and administrative challenges posed by the decentralized nature of Swiss governance, where cantonal authorities have significant control over land use and infrastructure development (IEA).

On the other hand, the assertion that Switzerland aims for net-zero emissions is also true. The country has laid out a comprehensive plan to achieve this goal, which includes substantial investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency measures (IEA). However, the effectiveness of these measures is still under scrutiny, as current policies have been deemed insufficient to meet the 2030 targets (IEA).

The integration of CCS technologies into Switzerland's climate strategy indicates a recognition of the need for carbon management solutions, even if the infrastructure is not yet in place. This duality highlights a complex scenario: while Switzerland is proactive in setting ambitious climate goals, the practical implementation of necessary technologies like CO2 storage is lagging.

Conclusion

The verdict is Partially True. While it is correct that Switzerland currently lacks operational CO2 storage facilities, the country is actively pursuing net-zero emissions by 2050 through various legislative and strategic measures. The gap between ambitious climate goals and the current state of infrastructure presents a nuanced picture of Switzerland's climate strategy.

Sources

  1. The global environmental footprint of Switzerland's net ...
  2. Executive summary - Switzerland 2023 - Analysis - IEA
  3. Zurich project explores storing CO₂ beneath Switzerland
  4. New Factsheet Outlines Switzerland's ...
  5. Switzerland's greenhouse gas inventory

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Norway leads in planning CO2 storage facilities in the North Sea.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Norway leads in planning CO2 storage facilities in the North Sea.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Norway leads in planning CO2 storage facilities in the North Sea.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Switzerland and Norway sign historic CO2 storage deal under the North Sea.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Switzerland and Norway sign historic CO2 storage deal under the North Sea.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Switzerland and Norway sign historic CO2 storage deal under the North Sea.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Around a dozen companies are launching CO2 storage pilot projects.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gor's office vets 4,000 political appointees but lacks his own clearance.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Gor's office vets 4,000 political appointees but lacks his own clearance.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gor's office vets 4,000 political appointees but lacks his own clearance.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Khatib family did not have access to an underground shelter, as Tamra, a Palestinian-majority town, lacks such facilities.
Needs Research

Fact Check: The Khatib family did not have access to an underground shelter, as Tamra, a Palestinian-majority town, lacks such facilities.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Khatib family did not have access to an underground shelter, as Tamra, a Palestinian-majority town, lacks such facilities.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Switzerland lacks CO2 storage facilities but aims for net-zero emissions. | TruthOrFake Blog