Fact Check: Supreme Court's decision doesn't negate Trump's attack on the 14th amendment.

Fact Check: Supreme Court's Decision Doesn't Negate Trump's Attack on the 14th Amendment

What We Know

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling that lifted temporary blocks on President Donald Trump's executive order regarding birthright citizenship. This order aimed to end automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents who are unlawfully present or temporarily in the country. The Supreme Court's decision, which passed with a 6-3 vote, focused primarily on the scope of nationwide injunctions rather than addressing the constitutionality of the executive order itself (source-4). Critics, including the ACLU, argue that this executive order is a direct assault on the 14th Amendment, which guarantees birthright citizenship (source-2).

The ruling allows for the possibility of partial enforcement of Trump's order, which could affect thousands of U.S.-born children. However, the Supreme Court did not rule on the legality of the executive order itself, leaving that question to be resolved in lower courts (source-6). The ACLU and other advocacy groups have vowed to continue fighting against the executive order, asserting that it contradicts the Constitution (source-2).

Analysis

The claim that the Supreme Court's decision does not negate Trump's attack on the 14th Amendment is partially true. The Supreme Court's ruling indeed does not provide a definitive answer regarding the constitutionality of Trump's executive order. Instead, it merely addresses the procedural aspect of nationwide injunctions, allowing lower courts to further examine the executive order's implications (source-4).

Critics of the ruling, including legal experts and civil rights organizations, emphasize that the executive order remains a significant threat to the principles enshrined in the 14th Amendment. They argue that the Supreme Court's decision to limit nationwide injunctions could lead to a situation where children born in the U.S. to undocumented parents may be denied citizenship, which fundamentally contradicts the constitutional guarantee of citizenship for all born on U.S. soil (source-2, source-8).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, with the ACLU being a well-respected civil rights organization and the Supreme Court's ruling being a primary legal document. However, the interpretation of the ruling can vary based on political and ideological perspectives, which may introduce some bias in the analysis of its implications.

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim that the Supreme Court's decision does not negate Trump's attack on the 14th Amendment is Partially True. While the Supreme Court's ruling allows for the potential enforcement of Trump's executive order, it does not address the order's constitutionality, leaving the door open for ongoing legal challenges. The implications of this ruling could still pose significant threats to the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment, particularly concerning birthright citizenship.

Fact Check: Supreme Court's decision doesn't negate Trump's attack on the 14th amendment.