Fact Check: Supreme Court Upholds Obamacare, Protecting Free Preventive Services for 150 Million Americans
What We Know
On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a significant provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), ensuring that approximately 150 million Americans will continue to receive many free preventive services. The ruling was a 6-3 decision, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh joining the three liberal justices in the majority. The case revolved around the authority of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) to determine which preventive services must be covered without cost-sharing under the ACA (NPR, AP News).
The lawsuit challenged the constitutionality of the appointment process for the task force members, arguing that they should be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. However, the Supreme Court found that the task force members are "inferior officers" who can be appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), thus upholding the current structure of the task force (New York Times, Reuters).
The preventive services covered include essential health measures such as HIV prevention, cancer screenings, and other critical health interventions that have been shown to significantly improve public health outcomes. The ruling is seen as a safeguard against the potential loss of these services, which could have resulted in increased out-of-pocket costs for patients (Washington Post, PBS).
Analysis
The Supreme Court's decision is grounded in a legal interpretation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. The majority opinion, written by Justice Kavanaugh, emphasized that the Secretary of HHS has significant control over the task force, including the ability to remove members, which justifies the current appointment process (AP News, Reuters). This interpretation aligns with previous judicial understandings of "inferior officers" and their appointment.
Critics of the ruling, including dissenting Justices, argued that the lack of Senate confirmation for task force members undermines the checks and balances intended by the Constitution. Justice Clarence Thomas, in his dissent, highlighted the importance of Senate approval for such appointments, suggesting that the ruling could set a concerning precedent for future governance (AP News, New York Times).
The sources used in this analysis are credible, with NPR, AP News, and the New York Times being established news organizations known for their journalistic integrity. They provide comprehensive coverage of legal issues and their implications for public policy. However, it is essential to recognize that the framing of the ruling can vary based on the outlet's editorial stance, which may influence how the information is presented.
Conclusion
The claim that the Supreme Court upheld Obamacare, protecting free preventive services for 150 million Americans, is True. The court's ruling confirmed the legality of the ACA's preventive care provisions, ensuring that millions of Americans will continue to have access to essential health services without additional costs. This decision not only preserves existing health benefits but also reinforces the authority of the HHS in determining health care coverage standards.
Sources
- Supreme Court upholds key Obamacare measure on preventive care
- Supreme Court preserves key part of Obamacare coverage requirements
- Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Care Provision in Affordable Care Act
- US Supreme Court preserves key element of Obamacare preventive care ...
- Supreme Court upholds Affordable Care Act's preventive care mandate
- DMD - Concession Ford Dinannaise Automobile Dinan - groupe …
- Supreme Court upholds key part of Affordable Care Act's free preventive ...
- CONTACTS AUTOMOBILES (GARAGE DE SEVIGNE) - L’Annuaire …
