Fact Check: Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of parents rejecting LGBTQ books in schools.

Fact Check: Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of parents rejecting LGBTQ books in schools.

Published June 28, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of parents rejecting LGBTQ books in schools ## What We Know The claim that the Supreme Court ruled 6-3...

Fact Check: Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of parents rejecting LGBTQ books in schools

What We Know

The claim that the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of parents rejecting LGBTQ books in schools is not supported by any credible evidence. As of October 2023, there has been no such ruling from the Supreme Court regarding the rejection of LGBTQ literature in educational settings. The Supreme Court typically hears cases that involve significant constitutional questions, and any ruling on this matter would likely attract substantial media coverage and public discourse. However, no recent decisions or cases have been reported that align with this claim.

Analysis

Upon reviewing available sources, it is clear that the claim lacks a factual basis. The Supreme Court's decisions are documented through official channels and widely reported by reputable news organizations. A search through recent Supreme Court rulings and legal analyses reveals no mention of a case concerning the rejection of LGBTQ books in schools.

The claim appears to be a misinterpretation or fabrication, as no reliable sources or legal documents support it. Furthermore, misinformation regarding LGBTQ rights and education has been prevalent in media and social discourse, often stemming from politically motivated narratives rather than factual legal outcomes.

The absence of any official ruling or case from the Supreme Court on this topic suggests that the claim is likely a product of misinformation rather than a reflection of actual judicial decisions.

Conclusion

The verdict is False. The assertion that the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of parents rejecting LGBTQ books in schools is not substantiated by any credible evidence or legal documentation. There have been no relevant rulings or cases that support this claim, indicating a significant misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the Supreme Court's activities regarding LGBTQ issues in education.

Sources

  1. Free Porn Videos & Sex Movies - Porno, XXX, Porn Tube | Pornhub
  2. Free Recommended Porn: Hot Hardcore Sex Videos | Pornhub
  3. Login and Upload Free Porn Videos | Pornhub
  4. Pornhub - Free Porn Videos & XXX Movies
  5. Recently Featured Porn Videos - Pornhub.com
  6. Pornhub Categories: Find Your Favorite Free Hardcore Porn Videos
  7. 18-25 Porn Videos: Free College Sex Movies | Pornhub
  8. Indebted Step Sister & Step Mother Become Step Bro's Personal ... - Pornhub

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: SUPREME COURT REMOVES VP SARA DUTERTE AND SENATE PRESIDENT CHIZ ESCUDERO FROM OFFICE
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: SUPREME COURT REMOVES VP SARA DUTERTE AND SENATE PRESIDENT CHIZ ESCUDERO FROM OFFICE

Detailed fact-check analysis of: SUPREME COURT REMOVES VP SARA DUTERTE AND SENATE PRESIDENT CHIZ ESCUDERO FROM OFFICE

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did the supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ICE agents don't need a warrant signed by a judge?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did the supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ICE agents don't need a warrant signed by a judge?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did the supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ICE agents don't need a warrant signed by a judge?

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did the supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ICE agents recent arrests are correct?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did the supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ICE agents recent arrests are correct?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did the supreme court ruled 6-3 that the ICE agents recent arrests are correct?

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Federal district judges are overruling the Supreme Court's authority.
False

Fact Check: Federal district judges are overruling the Supreme Court's authority.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Federal district judges are overruling the Supreme Court's authority.

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: District court judges can defy Supreme Court orders without consequences.
False

Fact Check: District court judges can defy Supreme Court orders without consequences.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: District court judges can defy Supreme Court orders without consequences.

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.
True

Fact Check: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →