Fact Check: Supreme Court Opens Door to Trump's Unconstitutional Birthright Citizenship Order
What We Know
On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that limited the ability of federal judges to issue universal injunctions against executive actions, including President Trump's controversial executive order regarding birthright citizenship. The executive order, issued on Trump's first day in office, asserts that the Fourteenth Amendment does not universally grant citizenship to all individuals born in the United States, particularly those born to non-citizen parents (source-1, source-3).
However, the Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the executive order itself. Instead, it focused on the procedural aspect of universal injunctions, which had previously blocked the enforcement of Trump's order. The Court's decision means that while lower courts can still hear cases related to the executive order, they may not issue nationwide injunctions that prevent its enforcement (source-2, source-4).
Analysis
The claim that the Supreme Court has opened the door to Trump's unconstitutional birthright citizenship order is misleading. The ruling primarily addressed the limitations on federal judges' ability to issue universal injunctions, which had previously prevented the enforcement of the executive order. The Court's decision does not equate to an endorsement of the executive order's legality or constitutionality (source-5, source-8).
The ruling has sparked concerns among immigrant rights groups and legal experts, who argue that it could lead to significant implications for birthright citizenship and the rights of children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. The plaintiffs in ongoing lawsuits maintain that Trump's executive order violates constitutional provisions (source-3, source-4).
The sources used in this analysis are credible and provide a balanced view of the Supreme Court's ruling and its implications. They include reports from major news outlets and legal analyses that reflect a range of perspectives on the issue.
Conclusion
The claim that the Supreme Court has opened the door to Trump's unconstitutional birthright citizenship order is False. The Court's recent ruling did not address the constitutionality of the executive order itself but rather limited the scope of federal judges' ability to issue universal injunctions. As such, the executive order remains legally contested, and its implications for birthright citizenship are still under scrutiny in ongoing legal challenges.
Sources
- Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025)
- Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to ...
- What is birthright citizenship and what happens after ...
- Supreme Court leaves fate of Trump birthright citizenship ...
- Supreme Court limits nationwide orders that have blocked ...
- Supreme Court Limits Nationwide Injunctions, Potentially ...
