Fact Check: Supreme Court leaves door open for class actions to challenge government policies.

Fact Check: Supreme Court Leaves Door Open for Class Actions to Challenge Government Policies

What We Know

On June 27, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling that significantly altered the landscape of judicial power concerning nationwide injunctions against government policies. The Court determined that district court judges likely exceeded their authority by issuing universal injunctions that blocked federal policies across the board. This ruling means that judges can only block government policies for "each plaintiff with standing to sue" (source-2). However, the Court made exceptions for class-action lawsuits, which can apply to groups of individuals in similar legal situations, and for cases brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (source-4).

The ruling has led to a complex legal environment where plaintiffs can still pursue class actions to challenge government policies, potentially allowing for broader implications than individual lawsuits. Legal experts suggest that this decision could lead to an increase in litigation as plaintiffs explore new avenues to contest government actions (source-3).

Analysis

The claim that the Supreme Court has left the door open for class actions to challenge government policies is partially true. The ruling indeed allows for class-action lawsuits to proceed, which can encompass a larger group of affected individuals. This is a significant point, as it suggests that while individual judges may have limited power to issue broad injunctions, collective actions through class suits remain viable.

However, the ruling also imposes stricter limitations on how courts can issue injunctions, which could complicate the ability of plaintiffs to achieve nationwide relief through class actions. The Court's decision was framed as a response to concerns about judicial overreach, particularly in the context of the Trump administration's policies (source-4). Critics argue that while class actions are permitted, the overall trend is toward limiting judicial intervention in executive actions, which could ultimately restrict the effectiveness of these lawsuits (source-6).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, with the ruling documented in official Supreme Court records and reported by reputable news outlets such as The New York Times and NPR. These sources provide a balanced view of the implications of the ruling, highlighting both the opportunities and limitations it presents for plaintiffs (source-2, source-3).

Conclusion

The verdict is Partially True. The Supreme Court's ruling does leave the door open for class actions to challenge government policies, which is a significant development. However, the broader context of the ruling indicates a tightening of judicial powers concerning nationwide injunctions, which may limit the effectiveness of such actions. Thus, while class actions remain a viable option, the overall judicial landscape is shifting towards greater restrictions on the ability to block government policies.

Fact Check: Supreme Court leaves door open for class actions to challenge government policies.