Fact Check: Supreme Court Grants Trump Power to Bypass Nationwide Injunctions
What We Know
On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that significantly limits the use of nationwide injunctions, which have been employed by lower courts to block executive actions across the country. This decision was seen as a victory for the Trump administration, as it allows for a more streamlined process for implementing executive orders without the risk of being halted by a single judge's ruling. The ruling specifically addressed the use of "universal injunctions" that had been applied in several cases against Trump’s policies, particularly relating to immigration and citizenship issues (source-1, source-2).
The Supreme Court's decision was based on the argument that such injunctions disrupt the separation of powers and allow lower court judges to wield excessive authority over executive actions. The ruling was supported by all six justices who voted in favor, all of whom were appointed by Republican presidents (source-4).
Analysis
The claim that the Supreme Court granted Trump the power to bypass nationwide injunctions is partially true. The ruling does not grant Trump unilateral power to bypass the law; rather, it limits the scope of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions against executive actions. This means that while the Trump administration can move forward with its policies without the risk of nationwide blocks, it still must operate within the framework of the law and can be challenged in other ways.
Critics of the ruling argue that it undermines judicial checks on executive power, potentially allowing the president to implement controversial policies without adequate judicial oversight (source-3). The ruling has been characterized as a significant shift in judicial practice, with implications for future administrations as well. Legal experts have noted that this decision could embolden executive actions that may be deemed unconstitutional or harmful (source-6).
The sources supporting the claim come from the White House and legal analysts who view the ruling as a victory for the Trump administration. However, these sources may exhibit bias, as they are aligned with the administration's perspective (source-1). Conversely, critiques from mainstream media and legal analysts highlight the potential dangers of the ruling, suggesting that it could lead to unchecked executive power (source-4, source-3).
Conclusion
The claim that the Supreme Court granted Trump the power to bypass nationwide injunctions is partially true. While the ruling does limit the ability of lower courts to issue such injunctions, it does not grant Trump absolute power to ignore judicial oversight. The decision reflects a significant shift in the balance of power between the branches of government, which may have long-term implications for executive authority and judicial checks.
Sources
- “A BIG WIN”: Supreme Court Ends Excessive Nationwide ... White House
- 24A884 Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025) Supreme Court
- The Supreme Court has limited universal injunctions. What ... NPR
- With Supreme Court Ruling, Another Check on Trump's ... New York Times
- Скачать АССИСТЕНТ | Windows, Linux, MAC, Android Link
- Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on ... SCOTUS Blog
