Fact Check: Supreme Court allows South Carolina to block Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood.

Fact Check: Supreme Court allows South Carolina to block Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood.

Published June 26, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Supreme Court Allows South Carolina to Block Medicaid Funds for Planned Parenthood ## What We Know On June 26, 2025, the U.S. Supreme C...

Fact Check: Supreme Court Allows South Carolina to Block Medicaid Funds for Planned Parenthood

What We Know

On June 26, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that South Carolina can bar Planned Parenthood from receiving federal Medicaid funding for non-abortion services. This ruling allows states to disqualify Medicaid providers for reasons permitted by state law, effectively enabling South Carolina to block Medicaid reimbursements for services such as cancer screenings and physical exams provided by Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, which has historically served low-income residents in the state (NPR, New York Times).

The case centered around the interpretation of a provision in federal Medicaid law that guarantees patients the right to choose any qualified provider. However, the Supreme Court concluded that the law does not "clearly and unambiguously" provide individuals the right to sue to enforce this provision (CBS News). Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, emphasized that Congress did not specifically authorize such lawsuits, which could lead to a flood of litigation regarding Medicaid requirements (Washington Post).

Analysis

The Supreme Court's ruling is significant as it aligns with a broader conservative agenda to limit funding for organizations like Planned Parenthood, which provides a range of health services beyond abortion. The majority opinion stated that while Medicaid patients have the right to choose their providers, the statute does not grant them the right to enforce that choice through litigation (NPR, The Hill). This interpretation has raised concerns among advocates for reproductive rights, who argue that it undermines access to essential health services for low-income individuals (19th News).

Critics of the ruling, including dissenting justices, argue that it represents a civil rights issue, asserting that citizens should have the right to sue over violations of their rights to choose healthcare providers (New York Times). Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in her dissent, highlighted the potential harm to Medicaid recipients who may lose access to critical healthcare services due to state-level decisions (CBS News).

The reliability of the sources used in this fact-check is high, as they include major news outlets with established reputations for journalistic integrity. The NPR article provides a comprehensive overview of the ruling and its implications, while the New York Times and Washington Post offer detailed analyses of the legal arguments presented in the case.

Conclusion

The claim that the Supreme Court has allowed South Carolina to block Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood is True. The Court's decision confirms that states can disqualify Medicaid providers based on state law, and it underscores the limitations placed on individuals seeking to enforce their rights under Medicaid. This ruling has significant implications for access to healthcare services, particularly for low-income individuals who rely on organizations like Planned Parenthood for essential health services.

Sources

  1. Supreme Court upholds South Carolina's ban on Medicaid funds for ...
  2. Supreme Court Rules Planned Parenthood Cannot Sue Over S. Carolina ...
  3. Supreme Court rules against Planned Parenthood in patient rights case
  4. Supreme Court rules for South Carolina in bid to block Medicaid funds ...
  5. Supreme Court: South Carolina can 'defund' Planned Parenthood from Medicaid
  6. Supreme Court rules South Carolina can cut off Medicaid funding for ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Kim Davis was jailed in 2015 for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. She is now trying to get the Supreme Court to overturn same-sex marriage, likened to Roe v. Wade.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in the Supreme Court than ordinary citizens.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in the Supreme Court than ordinary citizens.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in the Supreme Court than ordinary citizens.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Abortions are actually up since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Abortions are actually up since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Abortions are actually up since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on abortion rights since 1973.
True

Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on abortion rights since 1973.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on abortion rights since 1973.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Wisconsin Supreme Court has the authority to interpret state laws.
True

Fact Check: The Wisconsin Supreme Court has the authority to interpret state laws.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Wisconsin Supreme Court has the authority to interpret state laws.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to review state laws.
True

Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to review state laws.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to review state laws.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →