Fact Check: Support for Hamas flagged as a disqualifying factor for student visas.

Fact Check: Support for Hamas flagged as a disqualifying factor for student visas.

Published June 19, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Support for Hamas flagged as a disqualifying factor for student visas ## What We Know Recent legislative proposals and actions by the U...

Fact Check: Support for Hamas flagged as a disqualifying factor for student visas

What We Know

Recent legislative proposals and actions by the U.S. government indicate that support for Hamas is increasingly being viewed as a disqualifying factor for student visas. A bill known as the Terrorist Inadmissibility Codification Act, introduced by Rep. August Pfluger, aims to expand the existing Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit not only members of designated terrorist organizations but also anyone who endorses or espouses their activities from entering or remaining in the U.S. This includes groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and others (Fox News).

The U.S. State Department has also begun revoking student visas for individuals perceived to support Hamas, particularly those involved in pro-Gaza protests. This action is part of a broader initiative to restructure the visa vetting process, which has been paused for new interviews (The Guardian, Axios). The existing regulations under the Immigration and Nationality Act already disqualify individuals engaged in terrorist activities or those who provide material support to such organizations (9 FAM).

Analysis

The claim that support for Hamas is flagged as a disqualifying factor for student visas is substantiated by both proposed legislation and current administrative practices. The Terrorist Inadmissibility Codification Act explicitly aims to broaden the criteria for inadmissibility to include mere endorsement of terrorist ideologies, which marks a significant shift from previous standards that required evidence of direct involvement or material support (Fox News).

The reliability of the sources reporting this information varies. The Fox News article provides a direct account of the legislative proposal and includes statements from lawmakers, which lends credibility to the claims made. However, it is important to note that Fox News has been criticized for potential bias in its reporting. On the other hand, articles from The Guardian and Axios corroborate the information regarding the State Department's actions, which adds a layer of reliability due to their established reputations for journalistic integrity (The Guardian, Axios).

The 9 FAM document outlines existing immigration laws related to terrorism, confirming that the U.S. has long had provisions to deny visas based on associations with terrorist organizations. This document is an official government source, providing a strong foundation for understanding the legal framework surrounding these issues (9 FAM).

Conclusion

The claim that support for Hamas is flagged as a disqualifying factor for student visas is True. Legislative efforts and administrative actions by the U.S. government clearly indicate a shift towards stricter scrutiny of individuals based on their expressed support for terrorist organizations, including Hamas. The combination of proposed laws and current practices supports this conclusion, making it evident that the U.S. is taking a more aggressive stance on this issue.

Sources

  1. GOP bill seeks to ban and deport visa holders who support ...
  2. 9 FAM 302.6 (U) INELIGIBILITIES BASED ON TERRORISM ...
  3. US to revoke student visas over 'pro-Hamas' social media ...
  4. State Dept. to use AI to revoke visas of foreign students ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Without cheating, fraud, and deceit, the West would not be able to support sustainable as well as social immorality.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Without cheating, fraud, and deceit, the West would not be able to support sustainable as well as social immorality.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Without cheating, fraud, and deceit, the West would not be able to support sustainable as well as social immorality.

Aug 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Adrian Zenz is the only source used to support the Uyghur genocide claims
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Adrian Zenz is the only source used to support the Uyghur genocide claims

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Adrian Zenz is the only source used to support the Uyghur genocide claims

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Americans Support Renaming Kennedy Center After E. Jean Carroll
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Americans Support Renaming Kennedy Center After E. Jean Carroll

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Americans Support Renaming Kennedy Center After E. Jean Carroll

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: does evidence support trump and j. epstein being pedophiles?
False

Fact Check: does evidence support trump and j. epstein being pedophiles?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: does evidence support trump and j. epstein being pedophiles?

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
Vance you flip flop faster than
pages in the Bible. You talk a
big game about Christian values
but you support closing the
border, deporting refugees,
separating immigrant families,
even building detention camps.
You treat faith like a
political tool. One day you use
it to oppose same sex marriage.
The next you use it to justify
expansionism. On Sunday you're
on your knees in church. On
Monday you're backing Trump's
America first agenda. In the of
traditional family, you support
00:32
cutting aid for the poor. In
the name of border security,
you support violent enforcement
against asylum seekers. That's
not defending values that's
wrapping cruelty in scripture.
You say it's about protecting
the country but I remember
Jesus talked about welcoming
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →