Fact Check: society plays a big role in why men are stronger than women

Fact Check: society plays a big role in why men are stronger than women

Published June 3, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Society Plays a Big Role in Why Men Are Stronger Than Women ## Introduction The claim that "society plays a big role in why men are stronger than w...

Society Plays a Big Role in Why Men Are Stronger Than Women

Introduction

The claim that "society plays a big role in why men are stronger than women" suggests that social constructs and cultural norms significantly influence physical strength differences between genders. This assertion invites examination of both biological and sociocultural factors that contribute to perceived strength disparities.

What We Know

  1. Biological Differences: Research indicates that adult men typically exhibit greater strength and power than women, largely due to biological factors such as muscle mass, hormonal differences (particularly testosterone), and body composition. For instance, a study found that male athletes demonstrated significantly higher strength levels compared to female athletes when adjusted for body mass and lean body mass 12.

  2. Evolutionary Perspectives: Some sources argue that evolutionary factors have historically favored physical strength in males due to roles in protection and labor division. This perspective posits that natural selection has played a role in shaping these differences, with men evolving to be physically stronger to compete for mates and fulfill societal roles 67.

  3. Sociocultural Influences: Other studies suggest that societal structures and cultural norms contribute to the differences in strength perception and expression. For example, one article discusses how societal power dynamics may influence the agency displayed by men and women, indicating that men generally hold more power in many societies, which may affect how strength is perceived and valued 3.

  4. Psychological and Emotional Factors: The concept of strength is not solely physical; it also encompasses psychological and emotional dimensions. Some sources argue that societal expectations shape how strength is expressed and perceived in both genders, complicating the comparison of physical strength alone 10.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim that society influences strength differences is multifaceted.

  • Biological Sources: The studies cited 124 are published in peer-reviewed journals, lending them credibility. However, they primarily focus on biological determinants and do not fully address the sociocultural aspects that may influence strength perceptions.

  • Sociocultural Sources: The articles discussing societal roles 3610 provide valuable insights into how culture shapes perceptions of strength. However, these sources may carry inherent biases, as they often stem from social science perspectives that may emphasize sociocultural factors over biological ones. Additionally, the methodologies used in these studies vary, and some may rely on qualitative assessments that can be subjective.

  • Conflicting Evidence: While biological explanations for strength differences are well-documented, the extent to which societal factors play a role remains less clear. Some sources may overstate the influence of social constructs without adequately addressing the biological underpinnings. For instance, while societal roles may influence how strength is expressed, they do not negate the biological differences that exist 89.

  • Need for Additional Research: To fully understand the interplay between biology and society in shaping strength differences, further interdisciplinary research would be beneficial. Studies that integrate both biological and sociocultural perspectives could provide a more comprehensive view of the issue.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that society plays a significant role in why men are stronger than women is partially true. Evidence supports the notion that biological factors, such as muscle mass and hormonal differences, contribute to the physical strength disparities observed between genders. However, sociocultural influences also play a role in shaping perceptions and expressions of strength.

The complexity of this issue lies in the interplay between biological and sociocultural factors, which suggests that while societal constructs may influence how strength is perceived and valued, they do not fully account for the inherent biological differences. The existing research highlights the need for a nuanced understanding that recognizes both dimensions.

It is important to note that the available evidence has limitations. Many studies focus predominantly on either biological or sociocultural aspects, often neglecting to integrate both perspectives. This gap indicates that further research is needed to comprehensively address the interplay of these factors.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the multifaceted nature of strength differences between genders, recognizing that both biology and society contribute to this complex issue.

Sources

  1. Bartolomei, S. (2021). A Comparison between Male and Female Athletes in Strength and Power Performance. Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7930971/
  2. The Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Athletic Performance. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37772882/
  3. Are many sex/gender differences really power differences? Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10898859/
  4. Mansour, G. B. (2021). The effect of body composition on strength and power in ... Retrieved from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8628437/
  5. Mars vs. Venus: The Gender Gap in Health. Retrieved from https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/mars-vs-venus-the-gender-gap-in-health
  6. Why Are Males Stronger Than Females in Evolution? Retrieved from https://biologyinsights.com/why-are-males-stronger-than-females-in-evolution/
  7. Why have men evolved to be stronger? - The Environmental Literacy Council. Retrieved from https://enviroliteracy.org/why-have-men-evolved-to-be-stronger/
  8. Why are males stronger than females? - ScienceOxygen. Retrieved from https://scienceoxygen.com/why-are-males-stronger-than-females/
  9. The Battle of the Sexes. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hide-and-seek/201207/the-battle-the-sexes
  10. Are Women Stronger Than Men? Exploring Strength, Resilience, And Gender Differences. Retrieved from https://scientificorigin.com/are-women-stronger-than-men-exploring-strength-resilience-and-gender-differences

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.”

Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism

➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio
THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo

Detailed fact-check analysis of: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Police chiefs claim cannabis is worse for society than heroin.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Police chiefs claim cannabis is worse for society than heroin.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Police chiefs claim cannabis is worse for society than heroin.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Freemasonry is an occult secret society and many masons aren't even aware of the overarching goals of freemasonry because that is only revealed to the highest degree members, ie. 33rd degree masons.... thus lower level masons are quite ignorant to the real intent and purposes
Partially True

Fact Check: Freemasonry is an occult secret society and many masons aren't even aware of the overarching goals of freemasonry because that is only revealed to the highest degree members, ie. 33rd degree masons.... thus lower level masons are quite ignorant to the real intent and purposes

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Freemasonry is an occult secret society and many masons aren't even aware of the overarching goals of freemasonry because that is only revealed to the highest degree members, ie. 33rd degree masons.... thus lower level masons are quite ignorant to the real intent and purposes

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Contract murders are spreading from gangland into wider South African society

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Contract murders are spreading from gangland into wider South African society

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump represents the kind of person modern society was designed to create.
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump represents the kind of person modern society was designed to create.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump represents the kind of person modern society was designed to create.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →