Fact Check: society plays a big role in why men are seen as more dangerous than women

Fact Check: society plays a big role in why men are seen as more dangerous than women

Published June 3, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Introduction The claim that "society plays a big role in why men are seen as more dangerous than women" suggests that cultural and social construct...

Introduction

The claim that "society plays a big role in why men are seen as more dangerous than women" suggests that cultural and social constructs significantly influence perceptions of gender and danger. This assertion invites exploration into how societal norms, stereotypes, and behaviors shape the way men and women are viewed in terms of risk and violence.

What We Know

  1. Violence and Gender: Research indicates that men are statistically more likely to perpetrate various forms of violence, including intimate partner violence and homicide. A study by PJ Fleming highlights that men are responsible for nearly all types of interpersonal violence, which contributes to societal perceptions of men as more dangerous than women 1.

  2. Hegemonic Masculinity: The concept of hegemonic masculinity describes a societal ideal where dominance and aggression are associated with being male. This ideology reinforces the notion that men must exhibit traits such as power and control, often leading to the perception that they are inherently more dangerous 2.

  3. Risk Perception: Gender differences in risk perception have been documented, with studies showing that women often report higher levels of concern regarding risk compared to men. This discrepancy may influence societal views, framing men as more reckless or dangerous 3.

  4. Toxic Masculinity: The notion of toxic masculinity suggests that societal expectations of men to be unemotional and aggressive can lead to harmful behaviors. This stereotype can perpetuate the idea that men are more dangerous than women, as they are often portrayed as violent and power-hungry 4.

  5. Rigid Gender Roles: Fixed beliefs about gender roles contribute to stereotypes that men are naturally suited to be aggressive and dominant, while women are seen as nurturing and passive. These stereotypes can skew public perception, reinforcing the idea that men pose a greater threat 5.

  6. Perceptions of Violence: A study examining gender stereotypes and perceptions of violence found that societal beliefs often categorize men as more likely to engage in violent behavior, further entrenching the idea that men are more dangerous 6.

Analysis

The claim that societal factors contribute to the perception of men as more dangerous than women is supported by a variety of studies and theoretical frameworks. However, the reliability of these sources varies, and a critical assessment is necessary.

  • Source Reliability: The studies cited from peer-reviewed journals (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 6) are generally credible due to their academic rigor and citation history. However, it is essential to consider the context in which these studies were conducted. For instance, while Fleming's research provides statistical evidence of men's violence, it does not address the underlying societal factors that may contribute to these behaviors.

  • Potential Bias: Some sources, such as articles discussing toxic masculinity (4), may carry a bias against traditional masculinity, which could affect their interpretation of data. While these perspectives are valuable, they should be balanced with other viewpoints that consider the nuances of gender behavior.

  • Methodological Concerns: Many studies rely on self-reported data or perceptions, which can be influenced by societal norms and biases. For example, the research on risk perception (3) may not fully capture the complexities of gendered experiences in different contexts.

  • Conflicting Evidence: While there is substantial evidence supporting the claim, it is also essential to recognize that not all men conform to the stereotypes of danger and aggression. Some studies suggest that men can also be victims of violence and that societal narratives often overlook this aspect 9.

Conclusion

Verdict: True

The assertion that society plays a significant role in shaping perceptions of men as more dangerous than women is supported by a range of evidence. Key findings indicate that men are statistically more likely to commit acts of violence, and societal constructs such as hegemonic masculinity and rigid gender roles reinforce the stereotype of men as inherently dangerous. Additionally, cultural narratives surrounding toxic masculinity contribute to this perception, framing men in a light that emphasizes aggression and dominance.

However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence. While many studies provide credible insights, they may not fully account for the complexities of individual behavior and the diverse experiences of men and women. Furthermore, some sources may exhibit bias, which can influence interpretations of data.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the broader context of gender dynamics and societal influences. Understanding these nuances is essential for a comprehensive view of how perceptions of danger are constructed and perpetuated in society.

Sources

  1. PJ Fleming. "Men's violence against women and men are inter-related." National Institutes of Health. Link
  2. RM Smith. "Deconstructing Hegemonic Masculinity." National Institutes of Health. Link
  3. JL Hitchcock. "Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Broadening the Contexts." University of New Hampshire. Link
  4. "The Dangerous Effects of Toxic Masculinity." Verywell Mind. Link
  5. "Rigid gender roles and stereotypes." Safe and Equal. Link
  6. A Phillips. "Gender Stereotypes and Perceptions of Stranger Violence." Sage Journals. Link
  7. D Stevens. "Male warriors and worried women? Understanding gender and perceptions of security threats." Cambridge University Press. Link
  8. "When disaster strikes, men and women respond differently." PreventionWeb. Link
  9. A Vázquez. "Acknowledging that Men are Moral and Harmed by Gender Stereotypes." SpringerLink. Link
  10. "How Gender Norms Affect Our Perception." BetterHelp. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.”

Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism

➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio
THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo

Detailed fact-check analysis of: When discussing politics and the English language, George Orwell warned that “political speech and writing are largely a defense of the indefensible.” Researcher and political strategist Anat Shenker-Osorio highlights the words and phrases of fascism ➡️ Check out the updated dictionary and read Anat's full piece on the Contrarian Substack. Link in bio THE CONTRARIAN م people.. ...α series British Museum. fascism /faef12 wing political be JUL. JUL.16 16 of society and t FASCISM rful role for th of political AND THE THEiOn ascist /faefist ENGLISH You use fasci LANGUAGE systems whi ANAT SHENKER-OSORIO ...an upsurge Senalist and fo

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Police chiefs claim cannabis is worse for society than heroin.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Police chiefs claim cannabis is worse for society than heroin.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Police chiefs claim cannabis is worse for society than heroin.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Project 2025 wants America to be Cristian nationalist society
True

Fact Check: Project 2025 wants America to be Cristian nationalist society

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Project 2025 wants America to be Cristian nationalist society

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There has never been a socialist society that achieved promised utopian conditions.
True

Fact Check: There has never been a socialist society that achieved promised utopian conditions.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There has never been a socialist society that achieved promised utopian conditions.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The New Apostolic Reformation promotes the idea of Christians dominating all aspects of society.
True

Fact Check: The New Apostolic Reformation promotes the idea of Christians dominating all aspects of society.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The New Apostolic Reformation promotes the idea of Christians dominating all aspects of society.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →