TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Shooter voted for Trump and held conservative beliefs.

Fact Check: Shooter voted for Trump and held conservative beliefs.

Published June 19, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: Shooter Voted for Trump and Held Conservative Beliefs ## What We Know The claim that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the individual who attempte...

Fact Check: Shooter Voted for Trump and Held Conservative Beliefs

What We Know

The claim that Thomas Matthew Crooks, the individual who attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump, voted for Trump and held conservative beliefs lacks substantiated evidence. According to reports, Crooks was a 20-year-old from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, who shot at Trump during a political rally in July 2024. Investigators have not yet established a clear motive for his actions, and there is no confirmed information about his voting history or political affiliations (NPR).

While some sources indicate that Crooks had an interest in firearms and was a member of a shooting club, they do not provide concrete evidence of his political beliefs or voting record (NPR). Furthermore, there are no public records or statements confirming that he voted for Trump or identified as a conservative.

Analysis

The reliability of the sources discussing Crooks' background is mixed. NPR, which reported extensively on the incident, provides a detailed account of Crooks' life and the circumstances surrounding the shooting. However, it does not include any direct quotes or evidence supporting the claim that Crooks held conservative beliefs or voted for Trump (NPR).

Additionally, while there are reports of Crooks' interest in firearms, such interests do not inherently correlate with a specific political ideology. The narrative around Crooks is still developing, and law enforcement has emphasized the need for caution in speculating about his motives or beliefs (NPR).

In contrast, other sources discussing politically motivated violence, such as the case of Vance Boelter, provide insights into the political affiliations of suspects but do not directly relate to Crooks (AP News). This indicates that while there are instances of politically motivated violence linked to individuals with conservative beliefs, it does not serve as evidence for Crooks' political stance.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim that Thomas Matthew Crooks voted for Trump and held conservative beliefs is not currently supported by credible evidence. The investigation into his motives is ongoing, and without further information, it remains speculative. More research is needed to establish any definitive links between Crooks' political beliefs and his actions.

Sources

  1. Who was Thomas Matthew Crooks, the Trump shooter?
  2. Friends say Minnesota shooting suspect was deeply ...
  3. Thomas Matthew Crooks
  4. What we know about the Trump rally gunman so far
  5. What we know about Trump assassination suspect Routh's ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The alleged shooter Vance Boelter was reported to be a religious conservative who attended rallies in support of President Donald Trump, contradicting claims that he was a Marxist.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The alleged shooter Vance Boelter was reported to be a religious conservative who attended rallies in support of President Donald Trump, contradicting claims that he was a Marxist.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The alleged shooter Vance Boelter was reported to be a religious conservative who attended rallies in support of President Donald Trump, contradicting claims that he was a Marxist.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Vance Boetler was described as a conservative who voted for Trump in the last election.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Vance Boetler was described as a conservative who voted for Trump in the last election.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Vance Boetler was described as a conservative who voted for Trump in the last election.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In the 2024 presidential election, 67% of young white men from Gen Z voted for Donald Trump.
Needs Research

Fact Check: In the 2024 presidential election, 67% of young white men from Gen Z voted for Donald Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In the 2024 presidential election, 67% of young white men from Gen Z voted for Donald Trump.

Jun 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The suspect in the Minnesota assassinations, Vance Boetler, was reported by his former roommate to have voted for Trump and was a registered Republican.
True

Fact Check: The suspect in the Minnesota assassinations, Vance Boetler, was reported by his former roommate to have voted for Trump and was a registered Republican.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The suspect in the Minnesota assassinations, Vance Boetler, was reported by his former roommate to have voted for Trump and was a registered Republican.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Republican Senators falsely labeled shooter as a Marxist.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Republican Senators falsely labeled shooter as a Marxist.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Republican Senators falsely labeled shooter as a Marxist.

Jun 19, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks