Fact Check: "Shapes.inc is innocent"
What We Know
The claim that "Shapes.inc is innocent" appears to be related to allegations or concerns regarding the company's practices or legal standing. The Conviction Integrity Unit (CIU) of the Michigan Attorney General's office outlines that claims of innocence must be supported by new, credible, and material evidence that has not been previously addressed by any court (Conviction Integrity Unit - Attorney General). This suggests that any assertion of innocence must be substantiated by verifiable evidence.
In the context of Shapes.inc, there are various reviews and opinions available online. For instance, Trustpilot reviews indicate that there have been concerns about the company's practices, including allegations of a data breach (Shapes Reviews | Read Customer Service Reviews of shapes.inc - Trustpilot). Additionally, Scam Detector raises questions about the legitimacy of Shapes.inc, suggesting it may have been blacklisted by some online directories (shapes.inc Reviews: Is this site a scam or legit?).
Analysis
The claim of innocence for Shapes.inc lacks clarity and context. The CIU's guidelines emphasize that claims of factual innocence require substantial new evidence. Currently, there is no publicly available evidence that categorically supports the claim of innocence for Shapes.inc. The reviews on platforms like Trustpilot and Scam Detector indicate a mix of user experiences, with some users expressing concerns about the company's reliability and security practices.
The sources discussing the ethical obligations of prosecutors in innocence claims highlight the complexities involved in proving innocence, particularly when new evidence is required (The Ethical Obligations of Prosecutors in Cases Involving ...). This further complicates the assertion of innocence for Shapes.inc, as it suggests that any claims must be rigorously substantiated and cannot rely solely on public sentiment or anecdotal evidence.
Given the lack of clear evidence supporting the claim of innocence and the presence of negative reviews, it is essential to approach this claim with caution. The credibility of the sources discussing Shapes.inc is mixed, with user-generated content often reflecting personal experiences rather than objective assessments.
Conclusion
Needs Research: The claim that "Shapes.inc is innocent" requires further investigation. There is insufficient evidence to definitively support or refute the claim, and the existing reviews raise questions about the company's practices. Without credible, new evidence to substantiate the claim of innocence, it remains unverified.
