Fact Check: Sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States.

Fact Check: Sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States.

Published July 1, 2025
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "Sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States." ## What We Know The claim that "sexually explicit messages to ...

Fact Check: "Sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States."

What We Know

The claim that "sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States" is broadly accurate but requires clarification. In the U.S., laws regarding sexually explicit communications with minors vary by state, but there are federal laws that prohibit such actions. The Child Online Protection Act (COPA) and the PROTECT Act are two significant federal laws that address the distribution of obscene materials to minors, including sexually explicit messages.

Additionally, many states have enacted their own laws that specifically criminalize the sending of sexually explicit messages or images to minors. For example, laws against "sexting" often include provisions that make it illegal for adults to send sexually explicit content to individuals under the age of consent. The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) provides a comprehensive overview of these state laws, indicating that the legal landscape is complex and varies significantly from one jurisdiction to another.

Analysis

While the claim is fundamentally true, it is essential to recognize the nuances involved. The legality of sending sexually explicit messages to minors is not uniformly defined across the country. For instance, some states may have specific age thresholds or conditions under which such communications are considered illegal, while others may have more general prohibitions.

The federal laws mentioned earlier, such as COPA and the PROTECT Act, are designed to protect minors from exploitation and abuse, but enforcement and interpretation can vary. The reliability of the sources discussing these laws is generally high, as they come from established legal frameworks and reputable organizations like the NCSL. However, the interpretation of these laws can be influenced by local legal precedents and the specifics of individual cases, which can lead to differing outcomes in similar situations.

Moreover, the term "sexually explicit messages" can encompass a wide range of communications, from suggestive texts to graphic images, which further complicates the legal landscape. The American Bar Association (ABA) notes that the definitions and implications of such communications can vary, affecting how laws are applied in practice.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim that "sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States" is generally accurate but lacks specificity regarding the variations in state laws and the definitions of "sexually explicit." While there are federal laws that prohibit such actions, the enforcement and interpretation of these laws can differ significantly across jurisdictions. Therefore, without a clear and uniform legal standard applicable nationwide, the claim remains unverified in its absolute form.

Sources

  1. Child Online Protection Act (COPA)
  2. PROTECT Act
  3. National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) - Sexting Laws
  4. American Bar Association (ABA) - Sexting and the Law

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Anthony Weiner was sentenced to prison for sending explicit messages to a minor.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Anthony Weiner was sentenced to prison for sending explicit messages to a minor.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Anthony Weiner was sentenced to prison for sending explicit messages to a minor.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: States will lose power to regulate AI-generated explicit material and deepfakes!
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: States will lose power to regulate AI-generated explicit material and deepfakes!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: States will lose power to regulate AI-generated explicit material and deepfakes!

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 1993, Trump asked, "Is it wrong to be more sexually attractedto your own daughter than your wife?" At the time, Ivanka was 13 years old.
Unverified

Fact Check: In 1993, Trump asked, "Is it wrong to be more sexually attractedto your own daughter than your wife?" At the time, Ivanka was 13 years old.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 1993, Trump asked, "Is it wrong to be more sexually attractedto your own daughter than your wife?" At the time, Ivanka was 13 years old.

Aug 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: TikToker Alleges Former 'Impractical Jokers' Star Joe Gatto Sexually Assaulted Her When She Was 19
Unverified

Fact Check: TikToker Alleges Former 'Impractical Jokers' Star Joe Gatto Sexually Assaulted Her When She Was 19

Detailed fact-check analysis of: TikToker Alleges Former 'Impractical Jokers' Star Joe Gatto Sexually Assaulted Her When She Was 19

Mar 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: TikToker Alleges Former 'Impractical Jokers' Star Joe Gatto Sexually Assaulted Her When She Was 19
Unverified

Fact Check: TikToker Alleges Former 'Impractical Jokers' Star Joe Gatto Sexually Assaulted Her When She Was 19

Detailed fact-check analysis of: TikToker Alleges Former 'Impractical Jokers' Star Joe Gatto Sexually Assaulted Her When She Was 19

Mar 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sexually explicit messages to minors are illegal in the United States. | TruthOrFake Blog