TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Seven states, along with the District, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll — with full benefits — in their state’s Medicaid program.

Fact Check: Seven states, along with the District, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll — with full benefits — in their state’s Medicaid program.

Published June 13, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Seven states, along with the District, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll — with full benefits — in t...

Fact Check: "Seven states, along with the District, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll — with full benefits — in their state’s Medicaid program."

What We Know

As of late 2023, a growing number of states in the U.S. are providing health coverage to immigrants who are living in the country without legal authorization. According to a report by KFF Health News, eleven states and Washington, D.C. offer full health insurance coverage to low-income immigrants, regardless of their immigration status. This includes states like California, New York, and Illinois, which have expanded their Medicaid programs to include undocumented immigrants.

The states that currently provide full Medicaid benefits to undocumented immigrants include California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Washington, D.C. Additionally, Utah is set to begin covering children regardless of immigration status starting in January 2024, and other states are also expanding their coverage options. This trend is driven by the need to reduce the uninsured rate and improve public health outcomes, especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic (source-1).

Analysis

The claim that "seven states, along with the District, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll — with full benefits — in their state’s Medicaid program" is supported by multiple credible sources. The report from KFF Health News indicates that eleven states and D.C. currently provide full health insurance coverage to undocumented immigrants. This includes the states mentioned above, confirming that the claim is accurate.

Additionally, Newsweek corroborates this information, stating that more than a dozen states offer health coverage to undocumented migrants, further validating the claim. However, it is important to note that while some states have expanded their Medicaid programs, others are facing budgetary constraints that may lead to cuts in these programs, as highlighted in a report by NPR. This indicates a potential instability in the availability of these benefits, but does not negate the fact that they are currently offered.

The sources used in this analysis are reliable, with KFF Health News and NPR being well-respected in the field of health policy reporting. They provide data and insights based on state-level policies and expert opinions, making them credible sources for this fact-check.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that seven states, along with the District of Columbia, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll in their state’s Medicaid program with full benefits is accurate. Multiple sources confirm that these states have implemented policies to provide health coverage to undocumented immigrants, reflecting a significant shift in how states are addressing health care access for this population.

Sources

  1. More states extend health coverage to immigrants even as issue inflames GOP
  2. Unauthorized immigrants could lose health care in states
  3. Can undocumented immigrants get Medicaid?
  4. Map Shows 14 States Offering Health Coverage To Undocumented Migrants
  5. Map Shows 14 States Offering Health Coverage ... - Newsweek
  6. State Health Coverage for Immigrants and Implications for Health ... - KFF

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Myanmar has seven states, with Kayah being the smallest.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Myanmar has seven states, with Kayah being the smallest.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Myanmar has seven states, with Kayah being the smallest.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump administration denied disaster funding requests from seven states this spring.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump administration denied disaster funding requests from seven states this spring.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump administration denied disaster funding requests from seven states this spring.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump administration denied disaster mitigation funding for seven states this spring.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Trump administration denied disaster mitigation funding for seven states this spring.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump administration denied disaster mitigation funding for seven states this spring.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump administration denied disaster mitigation funding to seven states this spring.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Trump administration denied disaster mitigation funding to seven states this spring.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump administration denied disaster mitigation funding to seven states this spring.

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The storming of the Bastille held only seven inmates at the time.
True

Fact Check: The storming of the Bastille held only seven inmates at the time.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The storming of the Bastille held only seven inmates at the time.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Seven states, along with the District, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll — with full benefits — in their state’s Medicaid program. | TruthOrFake Blog