TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!

Fact Check: Senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!

Published June 30, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!" ## What We Know The claim that "Senators plan to cut voicemai...

Fact Check: "Senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!"

What We Know

The claim that "Senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025" appears to stem from a misunderstanding of the current situation regarding congressional phone lines. Reports indicate that during early February 2025, Senate offices experienced an unprecedented influx of calls, with some offices receiving as many as 1,600 calls per minute, compared to the typical 40 calls per minute (source-1, source-2). This surge in calls has led to many constituents being directed to voicemail due to the overwhelming volume, but there is no indication that this is a planned or permanent reduction in services.

Senators and their staff have acknowledged the challenges posed by the high volume of calls, which has resulted in full voicemail boxes and busy signals. For instance, Senator Lisa Murkowski expressed gratitude to Alaskans for their patience as her office dealt with the overwhelming number of messages (source-1). Additionally, an aide for Senator John Curtis noted that a significant portion of calls were critical of President Trump and his policies, reflecting the political climate at the time (source-1).

Analysis

The claim that voicemail services will be cut is misleading. The current situation is a result of an extraordinary surge in calls rather than a deliberate decision by senators to eliminate voicemail services. The reports indicate that while some constituents are being sent to voicemail due to the high call volume, this is a temporary measure to manage the influx and not an official policy change (source-2, source-4).

Moreover, the sources reporting on this situation are credible news outlets, including The New York Times and the Associated Press, which have a history of reliable reporting. They provide detailed accounts of the current state of congressional communication and the challenges faced by Senate offices due to the high volume of calls related to political issues (source-1, source-2). However, the interpretation of these events as a "plan" to cut voicemail services is not supported by the evidence.

Conclusion

The claim that senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025 is False. The current situation is a response to an overwhelming number of calls, leading to temporary voicemail usage, rather than a planned reduction in services. There is no indication from credible sources that such a policy change is being considered or implemented.

Sources

  1. As Trump and Musk Upend Washington, Congressional ... New York Times
  2. Callers swamp Senate offices in Trump's first week Associated Press
  3. Constituents are flooding New York federal lawmakers ... CBS News
  4. Voters jam lawmakers' phone lines, inboxes over Musk Detroit News

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Senators plan to cut off voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senators plan to cut off voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senators plan to cut off voicemail services for constituents in early 2025!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senators plan to cut off voicemail service for constituents in early 2025!
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senators plan to cut off voicemail service for constituents in early 2025!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senators plan to cut off voicemail service for constituents in early 2025!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senators plan to cut off voicemail for constituents in early 2025!
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senators plan to cut off voicemail for constituents in early 2025!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senators plan to cut off voicemail for constituents in early 2025!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senators cutting off voicemail access is cowardly and irresponsible.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Senators cutting off voicemail access is cowardly and irresponsible.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senators cutting off voicemail access is cowardly and irresponsible.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.
Unverified

Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Senators plan to cut voicemail services for constituents in early 2025! | TruthOrFake Blog