TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senators dispute Hegseth's claim that veterans want Confederate names restored.

Fact Check: Senators dispute Hegseth's claim that veterans want Confederate names restored.

Published June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Senators Dispute Hegseth's Claim That Veterans Want Confederate Names Restored ## What We Know During a recent Senate Armed Services Co...

Fact Check: Senators Dispute Hegseth's Claim That Veterans Want Confederate Names Restored

What We Know

During a recent Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed that military veterans and active-duty service members supported the restoration of Confederate names to military bases. He stated that this move was “important for morale” and that these names held a “legacy” for those who served at these bases (source-2). Hegseth's comments came in the context of the Trump administration's decision to revert several military bases back to their original names, which were named after Confederate generals, despite a Congressional mandate to rename them due to their association with slavery and rebellion against the United States (source-3).

Senators, including Angus King and Tammy Duckworth, strongly disputed Hegseth's assertions. King expressed confusion over the motivation behind restoring these names, questioning who was urging this change (source-1). Duckworth, a veteran herself, stated that she would prefer to be associated with Medal of Honor recipient Michael J. Novosel rather than a Confederate officer, directly contradicting Hegseth's claims that veterans supported the name restoration (source-2).

Analysis

The evidence presented during the Senate hearing indicates a clear divide between Hegseth's claims and the sentiments expressed by several senators. The senators' responses highlight a significant skepticism regarding Hegseth's assertion that veterans are in favor of restoring Confederate names. For instance, King and Duckworth both articulated strong opposition to the idea, emphasizing that the names represent a painful history rather than a legacy to honor (source-2).

The sources of Hegseth's claims seem to lack direct evidence or testimonials from veterans themselves, making his assertions appear anecdotal at best. In contrast, the senators provided a counter-narrative grounded in their own experiences and the broader context of military history, which suggests a more nuanced understanding of the implications of renaming military bases (source-3).

Furthermore, the credibility of the senators, particularly Duckworth, who has a personal stake in the discussion as a veteran, adds weight to their arguments. Duckworth's perspective as a combat veteran who has faced the consequences of war provides a critical lens through which to evaluate Hegseth's claims (source-2).

Conclusion

The claim that veterans want Confederate names restored to military bases is True. The evidence presented during the Senate hearing, particularly the strong rebuttals from Senators King and Duckworth, indicates that there is significant opposition among veterans regarding the restoration of these names. Hegseth's assertions lack substantiation from credible sources and are contradicted by the testimonies of those who have served, suggesting that his claims do not reflect the views of the broader veteran community.

Sources

  1. WATCH: Sen. King tells Hegseth restoring Confederate ...
  2. Hegseth says renaming military bases after Civil War ...
  3. Hegseth says renaming military bases after Civil War ...
  4. Sen. Kaine slams Defense Secy. Hegseth on renaming ...
  5. 'You Wanted To Restore The Confederate Names': Kaine's ...
  6. 'Why Are You Doing This?': King Grills Hegseth On Changing ...
  7. Trump administration live updates: Pete Hegseth faces ...
  8. Kaine's Confronts Hegseth About Changing Base Names

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The term for U.S. senators is six years.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The term for U.S. senators is six years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The term for U.S. senators is six years.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Senate consists of 100 members, with each state represented by two senators.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S. Senate consists of 100 members, with each state represented by two senators.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Senate consists of 100 members, with each state represented by two senators.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's resignation 'outrageous'.
True

Fact Check: Senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's resignation 'outrageous'.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's resignation 'outrageous'.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Virginia's senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's removal 'outrageous'.
True

Fact Check: Virginia's senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's removal 'outrageous'.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Virginia's senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's removal 'outrageous'.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Virginia's senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's resignation 'outrageous'.
True

Fact Check: Virginia's senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's resignation 'outrageous'.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Virginia's senators call DOJ's demand for UVA president's resignation 'outrageous'.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks