TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senators Blumenthal and Graham expressed concerns about the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran and supported strengthening sanctions against Iran.

Fact Check: Senators Blumenthal and Graham expressed concerns about the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran and supported strengthening sanctions against Iran.

Published June 16, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Senators Blumenthal and Graham Express Concerns About Nuclear-Armed Iran ## What We Know U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Lindsey G...

Fact Check: Senators Blumenthal and Graham Express Concerns About Nuclear-Armed Iran

What We Know

U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Lindsey Graham have publicly expressed concerns regarding the threat posed by a nuclear-armed Iran and have supported measures to strengthen sanctions against the country. In a recent statement, Senator Blumenthal emphasized that "A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat to the entire world, including the United States," highlighting the urgency of protecting U.S. personnel in the region and supporting Israel's right to defend itself against Iranian aggression (Blumenthal Statement on Israeli Strikes on Iran).

Additionally, both Senators were involved in introducing a bipartisan resolution that underscores the need for deterrence against Iran, advocating for the use of military options if necessary and calling for a broader framework of sanctions on Iran (Sullivan, Graham, Blumenthal & Colleagues Introduce Resolution). Senator Graham specifically noted that the resolution aims to hold Iran accountable for its actions and to deter further escalation in the region, reinforcing the stance that Iran is a significant threat due to its support for terrorist organizations (Sullivan, Graham, Blumenthal & Colleagues Introduce Resolution).

Analysis

The statements and actions of Senators Blumenthal and Graham are well-documented and reflect a consistent bipartisan concern regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions. Blumenthal's assertion about the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran is corroborated by his ongoing advocacy for U.S. military readiness and support for Israel, indicating a clear alignment with U.S. foreign policy objectives aimed at countering Iranian influence in the Middle East (Blumenthal Statement on Israeli Strikes on Iran).

Senator Graham's involvement in the resolution further supports the claim, as he explicitly mentioned the need for military preparedness and sanctions to deter Iranian aggression (Sullivan, Graham, Blumenthal & Colleagues Introduce Resolution). The resolution itself, which calls for maintaining all options on the table, including military force, solidifies the bipartisan consensus on the necessity of a strong response to Iran's actions (S.J.Res.106 - A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against the Islamic Republic of Iran).

Both Senators are credible sources, holding significant positions within the Senate and having a history of involvement in foreign policy matters. Their statements are consistent with established U.S. policy, which has long viewed Iran as a primary state sponsor of terrorism and a potential nuclear threat.

Conclusion

The claim that Senators Blumenthal and Graham expressed concerns about the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran and supported strengthening sanctions against Iran is True. Their statements and legislative actions clearly demonstrate a commitment to addressing the risks posed by Iran's nuclear ambitions and its destabilizing influence in the region.

Sources

  1. Blumenthal Statement on Israeli Strikes on Iran
  2. Press Releases | U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal
  3. Press Releases - United States Senator Lindsey Graham
  4. Sullivan, Graham, Blumenthal & Colleagues Introduce Resolution Supporting U.S. Efforts to Deter Iran
  5. S.J.Res.106 - A joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against the Islamic Republic of Iran for threatening the national security of the United States through the development of nuclear weapons
  6. U.S. Senators Katie Britt, Lindsey Graham: U.S. Can't Allow Iran to Obtain Nuclear Weapon
  7. Live Updates: Iranian Missiles Hit Multiple Sites in Tel Aviv, Injuring

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Only 47 senators supported limiting presidential war powers over Iran.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Only 47 senators supported limiting presidential war powers over Iran.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Only 47 senators supported limiting presidential war powers over Iran.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: etanyahu allegedly has more influence over U.S. senators than Donald Trump, affecting U.S. foreign policy decisions, especially on Iran.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: etanyahu allegedly has more influence over U.S. senators than Donald Trump, affecting U.S. foreign policy decisions, especially on Iran.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: etanyahu allegedly has more influence over U.S. senators than Donald Trump, affecting U.S. foreign policy decisions, especially on Iran.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump threatens primary challenges against GOP senators opposing his bill.
True

Fact Check: Trump threatens primary challenges against GOP senators opposing his bill.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump threatens primary challenges against GOP senators opposing his bill.

Jun 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.
Unverified

Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump threatens to back challengers against GOP senators opposing his agenda.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Trump threatens to back challengers against GOP senators opposing his agenda.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump threatens to back challengers against GOP senators opposing his agenda.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks