Fact Check: Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law.

Fact Check: Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law.

Published June 27, 2025
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law." ## What We Know The claim that "Senator Prosper criticized the rushed p...

Fact Check: "Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law."

What We Know

The claim that "Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law" lacks direct evidence from credible sources. The new law in question, the Inaugural Committee Transparency Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on January 16, 2025, and is designed to enhance transparency regarding the financial activities of presidential inaugural committees. The bill mandates that these committees disclose significant financial transactions to the Federal Election Commission within 90 days after the inaugural ceremony (source-1).

As of now, there is no public record or news report indicating that Senator Prosper has made any statements regarding the passage of this law or has expressed concerns about its timing or content. The absence of such statements from reliable news outlets or official Senate records raises questions about the veracity of the claim.

Analysis

The analysis of this claim reveals a lack of supporting evidence. The primary source regarding the new law is the official congressional record, which provides a detailed description of the bill's provisions but does not include any remarks or criticisms from Senator Prosper (source-1).

Moreover, the claim appears to be unsubstantiated by any major news outlets or political commentary platforms. The BBC and other reputable news organizations have not reported on any criticism from Senator Prosper regarding this legislation, which suggests that the claim may be based on misinformation or a misinterpretation of events (source-2).

Given that the claim lacks corroboration from credible sources, it is essential to consider the reliability of the information. The absence of direct quotes or references to Senator Prosper's statements makes it difficult to assess the context or intent behind the alleged criticism.

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that "Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law" is currently unsupported by credible evidence. Without direct statements or reliable reports confirming this assertion, further investigation is necessary to verify its accuracy. It is crucial to monitor official Senate communications and reputable news sources for any updates regarding Senator Prosper's position on this legislation.

Sources

  1. S.118 - Inaugural Committee Transparency Act of 2025
  2. UK | Latest News & Updates - BBC

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump threatens political retribution against GOP senator opposing his bill.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump threatens political retribution against GOP senator opposing his bill.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump threatens political retribution against GOP senator opposing his bill.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator McConnell admits Republicans face blowback over Medicaid cuts.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senator McConnell admits Republicans face blowback over Medicaid cuts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator McConnell admits Republicans face blowback over Medicaid cuts.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California Senator Susan Susan Eggman Walks Away From The wayFromTheDemocraticParty
Partially True

Fact Check: California Senator Susan Susan Eggman Walks Away From The wayFromTheDemocraticParty

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California Senator Susan Susan Eggman Walks Away From The wayFromTheDemocraticParty

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: My Executive Order, absolutely TREMENDOUS, makes MANDATORY watch INCREDIBLE, but very sad, documentary DOMINION! exposes the HORRIFIC behind the food we something the Deep State doesn't want know! thanks the patriot Senator Cory Booker, GREAT guy, streaming this White House movie room with the that learn SHOCKED, totally SHOCKED, million cows, million chickens, and BILLIONS (with BIG slaughtered EVERY DAY! Innocent, innocent animals. million This ghastly practice, folks, does NOT make America great. NO WAY! NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE WITH THE ANIMALS, best peace, better than anyone's you for your attention Thank this HUGE matter. WATCH DOMINION. 226K
False

Fact Check: My Executive Order, absolutely TREMENDOUS, makes MANDATORY watch INCREDIBLE, but very sad, documentary DOMINION! exposes the HORRIFIC behind the food we something the Deep State doesn't want know! thanks the patriot Senator Cory Booker, GREAT guy, streaming this White House movie room with the that learn SHOCKED, totally SHOCKED, million cows, million chickens, and BILLIONS (with BIG slaughtered EVERY DAY! Innocent, innocent animals. million This ghastly practice, folks, does NOT make America great. NO WAY! NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE WITH THE ANIMALS, best peace, better than anyone's you for your attention Thank this HUGE matter. WATCH DOMINION. 226K

Detailed fact-check analysis of: My Executive Order, absolutely TREMENDOUS, makes MANDATORY watch INCREDIBLE, but very sad, documentary DOMINION! exposes the HORRIFIC behind the food we something the Deep State doesn't want know! thanks the patriot Senator Cory Booker, GREAT guy, streaming this White House movie room with the that learn SHOCKED, totally SHOCKED, million cows, million chickens, and BILLIONS (with BIG slaughtered EVERY DAY! Innocent, innocent animals. million This ghastly practice, folks, does NOT make America great. NO WAY! NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE WITH THE ANIMALS, best peace, better than anyone's you for your attention Thank this HUGE matter. WATCH DOMINION. 226K

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: ! SENATOR RANDY PAUL IS OFFICIALLY ISSUING A CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF DR. FAUCI TO THE AG PAM BONDI!!! THIS IS HAPPENING BECAUSE IT WAS REVEALED THAT HE WAS PARDONED BY AN AUTO-PEN NOT JOE BIDE
False

Fact Check: ! SENATOR RANDY PAUL IS OFFICIALLY ISSUING A CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF DR. FAUCI TO THE AG PAM BONDI!!! THIS IS HAPPENING BECAUSE IT WAS REVEALED THAT HE WAS PARDONED BY AN AUTO-PEN NOT JOE BIDE

Detailed fact-check analysis of: ! SENATOR RANDY PAUL IS OFFICIALLY ISSUING A CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF DR. FAUCI TO THE AG PAM BONDI!!! THIS IS HAPPENING BECAUSE IT WAS REVEALED THAT HE WAS PARDONED BY AN AUTO-PEN NOT JOE BIDE

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Prosper criticized the rushed passage of the new law. | TruthOrFake Blog