TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senator Lindsey Graham suggested that the U.S. should provide bombs to eliminate Iran's nuclear program.

Fact Check: Senator Lindsey Graham suggested that the U.S. should provide bombs to eliminate Iran's nuclear program.

Published June 16, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Senator Lindsey Graham suggested that the U.S. should provide bombs to eliminate Iran's nuclear program." ## What We Know Senator Lind...

Fact Check: "Senator Lindsey Graham suggested that the U.S. should provide bombs to eliminate Iran's nuclear program."

What We Know

Senator Lindsey Graham has made several statements regarding the U.S. response to Iran's nuclear ambitions, particularly emphasizing military support for Israel. In a recent interview, Graham stated that if Iran does not return to negotiations, the U.S. should "go all in with Israel to eliminate the nuclear threat" (Jerusalem Post). This aligns with a broader sentiment expressed by Graham and other Republican senators, who have been vocal about the need for a strong military posture against Iran, particularly in light of its nuclear program (Fox News).

Furthermore, Graham has been part of a bipartisan resolution that calls for the complete dismantlement and destruction of Iran's nuclear program, asserting that this is crucial for U.S. national security and the safety of its allies (Britt Senate Press Release). He has also indicated that if diplomatic efforts fail, military options should remain on the table (Newsweek).

Analysis

The claim that Graham suggested the U.S. should provide bombs specifically is somewhat misleading. While he has indeed advocated for strong military action and support for Israel, the phrasing implies a direct call for the U.S. to supply bombs, which is not explicitly stated in his public comments. Instead, Graham emphasizes a collaborative military effort with Israel to address the nuclear threat posed by Iran, suggesting that the U.S. should support Israeli operations if diplomatic solutions fail (Jerusalem Post, Fox News).

The sources used to support this claim include Graham's own statements, which are credible as they come from established news outlets and official press releases. However, the interpretation of his words can vary, and the context is critical. Graham's rhetoric often emphasizes deterrence and military readiness rather than direct military action by the U.S. alone. This nuance is essential in evaluating the accuracy of the claim.

Conclusion

The claim that Senator Lindsey Graham suggested the U.S. should provide bombs to eliminate Iran's nuclear program is Partially True. While he has indeed called for strong military action and support for Israel in dealing with Iran's nuclear threat, he has not explicitly stated that the U.S. should provide bombs. His comments advocate for a collaborative military approach rather than unilateral action by the U.S. alone.

Sources

  1. U.S. Senators Katie Britt, Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton ...
  2. Iran's Nuclear Bomb Is Ready? Hegseth Drops Bombshell At ...
  3. Sen. Lindsey Graham backs US support for Israel against ...
  4. Lindsey Graham Warns of Iran Nuclear Bombs: 'They'll ...
  5. Sen. Lindsey Graham slammed for 'game on' tweet after ...
  6. Graham: U.S. support for Israeli strikes on Iran would 'reset ...
  7. Sen. Lindsey Graham slammed for 'game on' tweet after ...
  8. GOP senators back Trump's hard line on Iran, split on US ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Lindsey Graham has served multiple terms as a U.S. senator.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Lindsey Graham has served multiple terms as a U.S. senator.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Lindsey Graham has served multiple terms as a U.S. senator.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: California Senator Susan Susan Eggman Walks Away From The wayFromTheDemocraticParty
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: California Senator Susan Susan Eggman Walks Away From The wayFromTheDemocraticParty

Detailed fact-check analysis of: California Senator Susan Susan Eggman Walks Away From The wayFromTheDemocraticParty

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.
Partially True

Fact Check: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Last week, we call for a full-scale investigation into Trump's abysmal handling of the Texas floods and Senator Ruben Gallego agrees. He's calling for a full-scale investigation because we've gotta know what happened.

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.
Partially True

Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator McConnell admits Republicans face backlash over Medicaid cuts.
Partially True

Fact Check: Senator McConnell admits Republicans face backlash over Medicaid cuts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator McConnell admits Republicans face backlash over Medicaid cuts.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Senator Lindsey Graham suggested that the U.S. should provide bombs to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. | TruthOrFake Blog