TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri expressed surprise at the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of President Donald Trump's bill, stating it is a 'major departure from the House framework.'

Fact Check: Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri expressed surprise at the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of President Donald Trump's bill, stating it is a 'major departure from the House framework.'

Published June 17, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Senator Josh Hawley's Surprise at Provider Tax Rate Change ## What We Know Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri publicly expressed his surpr...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Fact Check: Senator Josh Hawley's Surprise at Provider Tax Rate Change

What We Know

Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri publicly expressed his surprise regarding a significant change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of President Donald Trump's bill. He stated, “This is a major departure from the House framework. This took me totally by surprise” (CNN). The provider tax is a crucial funding mechanism for Medicaid programs in various states, and the alterations proposed in the Senate version diverged from what was initially outlined in the House's version of the bill (New York Times).

The House version of the bill had already faced criticism for its proposed cuts to Medicaid, which included stricter work requirements and funding reductions that could leave millions uninsured (New York Times). Hawley's comments highlight the ongoing tensions within the Republican Party regarding the balance between tax cuts and social safety net programs.

Analysis

Hawley's assertion that the change to the provider tax rate was unexpected aligns with reports from multiple sources. According to CNN, he was "taken completely off-guard" by the modifications made in the Senate version, indicating that he had not anticipated such a significant departure from the House's framework (CNN). This suggests that there may have been a lack of communication or consultation among GOP senators regarding the changes, which could lead to further complications in garnering support for the bill.

The reliability of the sources reporting on this matter is strong. CNN is a well-established news organization known for its political reporting, and the New York Times has a long history of journalistic integrity and thorough reporting on legislative matters. Both outlets provided consistent accounts of Hawley's statements and the context surrounding the changes to the bill.

However, it is essential to consider the political motivations behind such statements. Hawley, being a populist Republican, has been vocal about his concerns regarding Medicaid cuts, framing them as detrimental to the poor (New York Times). This positions him within a faction of the party that is wary of drastic cuts to social programs, which may influence his public statements and reactions.

Conclusion

The claim that Senator Josh Hawley expressed surprise at the change to the provider tax rate in the Senate version of President Donald Trump's bill is True. His comments reflect a genuine reaction to a significant legislative alteration that diverged from the House's framework, highlighting internal party divisions and the complexities of negotiating such a substantial bill.

Sources

  1. One Big Beautiful Bill Act 119th Congress (2025-2026)
  2. What's in Trump's Domestic Policy Bill? Medicaid Reform ...
  3. 知乎 - 有问题，就会有答案
  4. Senate GOP hits roadblocks in push to pass Trump's tax ...
  5. Josh: Series 3, Episode 3 - Bicycles & Babies - British Comedy Guide
  6. Josh Widdicombe - British Comedy Guide
  7. Hawley: 'Great talk' with Trump on Medicaid - Live Updates
  8. Josh Widdicombe reveals his disability - British Comedy Guide
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Ashley Moody and President Trump just delivered—for YOU. ✅ No tax on tips. ✅ No tax on overtime. ✅ Medicare protected.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump threatens political retribution against GOP senator opposing his bill.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump threatens political retribution against GOP senator opposing his bill.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump threatens political retribution against GOP senator opposing his bill.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's tax bill faces opposition from eight Republican senators.
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump's tax bill faces opposition from eight Republican senators.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's tax bill faces opposition from eight Republican senators.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis won't seek reelection after opposing Trump's bill.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis won't seek reelection after opposing Trump's bill.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis won't seek reelection after opposing Trump's bill.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Trump risks his presidency by humiliating his own senator.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump risks his presidency by humiliating his own senator.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks