TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senator calls anti-vaccine activist 'extremist' after CDC hiring!

Fact Check: Senator calls anti-vaccine activist 'extremist' after CDC hiring!

Published June 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Senator Calls Anti-Vaccine Activist 'Extremist' After CDC Hiring ## What We Know Recently, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) publicly co...

Fact Check: Senator Calls Anti-Vaccine Activist 'Extremist' After CDC Hiring

What We Know

Recently, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) publicly condemned the reported hiring of Lyn Redwood, a known anti-vaccine activist, to a position at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In her statement, Senator Murray referred to Redwood as an "anti-vax extremist" and expressed serious concerns about the implications of such a hiring decision for public health and vaccine safety (source-1). Murray emphasized that both Republicans and Democrats should be alarmed by the appointment, labeling it as "disturbing" and a potential threat to children's health (source-1).

Murray's comments came in the wake of broader concerns regarding the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which had recently been purged of its members by Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is also known for his anti-vaccine stance (source-2). This move has been described as unprecedented and dangerous, with experts warning that it undermines public trust in vaccine safety and efficacy (source-2).

Analysis

Senator Murray's characterization of Lyn Redwood as an "anti-vax extremist" is supported by her long-standing opposition to vaccine misinformation and her advocacy for scientific integrity in public health policy. Murray has a history of addressing vaccine skepticism and has been vocal about the importance of vaccines in preventing disease outbreaks (source-1).

The sources of Murray's statements are credible, as they come directly from her official communications and press conferences, which are designed to inform the public and hold government officials accountable. Furthermore, the context in which Redwood was hired—under the leadership of RFK Jr., a prominent anti-vaccine figure—adds weight to Murray's claims. Reports indicate that Kennedy's actions, including the firing of ACIP members and the appointment of individuals associated with vaccine misinformation, have raised alarms among public health experts (source-2; source-6).

However, it is essential to consider potential biases in the framing of the situation. Senator Murray is a Democratic senator and has been a vocal opponent of RFK Jr. and his policies, which could influence her rhetoric. Despite this, the evidence presented in her statements aligns with broader concerns from the public health community regarding the implications of hiring individuals with anti-vaccine views to influential positions in health agencies.

Conclusion

The claim that Senator Patty Murray called Lyn Redwood an "anti-vaccine extremist" in response to her hiring by the CDC is True. Murray's statements are well-documented and reflect her ongoing commitment to promoting vaccine safety and combating misinformation. Given the context of Redwood's hiring and the actions taken by RFK Jr. at the CDC, Murray's concerns are substantiated by credible evidence and align with the views of many public health experts.

Sources

  1. Senator Murray Calls on White House to Reverse Reported Hiring of Anti ...
  2. Senator Murray, Former ACIP Member from WA State Raise Alarm Over Purge ...
  3. CDC nominee Dave Weldon is likely to be pressed on his vaccine views at ...
  4. RFK Jr.'s CDC panel ditches some flu shots based on anti-vaccine junk ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis will not seek reelection after opposing the bill.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis will not seek reelection after opposing the bill.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis will not seek reelection after opposing the bill.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis announces he won't seek reelection after Trump attacks!
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis announces he won't seek reelection after Trump attacks!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis announces he won't seek reelection after Trump attacks!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Thom Tillis has served as a U.S. senator since 2015.
True

Fact Check: Thom Tillis has served as a U.S. senator since 2015.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Thom Tillis has served as a U.S. senator since 2015.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Trump risks his presidency by humiliating his own senator.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump risks his presidency by humiliating his own senator.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis opposes the bill, citing billions in healthcare losses for North Carolina.
True

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis opposes the bill, citing billions in healthcare losses for North Carolina.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis opposes the bill, citing billions in healthcare losses for North Carolina.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Senator calls anti-vaccine activist 'extremist' after CDC hiring! | TruthOrFake Blog