TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Senator Alex Padilla of California was handcuffed by federal agents while trying to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question at a press conference on October 2023.

Fact Check: Senator Alex Padilla of California was handcuffed by federal agents while trying to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question at a press conference on October 2023.

Published June 15, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
āœ“
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Senator Alex Padilla of California was handcuffed by federal agents while trying to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a quest...

Fact Check: "Senator Alex Padilla of California was handcuffed by federal agents while trying to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question at a press conference on October 2023."

What We Know

On October 12, 2023, during a press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles, Senator Alex Padilla attempted to ask a question regarding immigration enforcement actions. According to multiple sources, Padilla was forcibly removed from the event by federal agents and subsequently handcuffed (AP News, NPR). Video footage shows a Secret Service agent grabbing Padilla and pushing him out of the room as he shouted, "Iā€™m Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary" (AP News).

Padilla later reported that he was not arrested but was indeed handcuffed after being forced to the ground (NPR). The incident sparked outrage among Democratic lawmakers, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer expressing his disgust at the treatment of a sitting senator (NPR).

Analysis

The claim that Senator Alex Padilla was handcuffed by federal agents while trying to ask a question at a press conference is supported by credible news sources. The Associated Press and NPR, both reputable news organizations, reported on the incident, detailing the sequence of events and Padilla's attempts to identify himself as a senator during the confrontation (AP News, NPR).

Critically, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a statement claiming that Padilla did not comply with requests to back away and characterized his actions as "disrespectful political theater" (NPR). However, video evidence contradicts this claim, showing Padilla identifying himself as he was being removed, which raises questions about the DHS's narrative (AP News).

The incident has been framed within a larger context of tensions surrounding immigration enforcement and the Trump administration's policies, which adds a layer of political significance to the event. Given the corroboration from multiple reliable sources and the availability of video evidence, the claim stands robust against scrutiny.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The assertion that Senator Alex Padilla was handcuffed by federal agents while attempting to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question at a press conference is accurate. The incident was widely reported, supported by video evidence, and confirmed by multiple reputable news outlets. The context of the event further underscores its significance within ongoing political debates regarding immigration enforcement.

Sources

  1. Sen. Alex Padilla forcibly removed from Kristi Noem's news conference ...
  2. Democratic Sen. Padilla forcibly removed from DHS press ...
  3. National Guard Use in Los Angeles in Doubt After Court Rulings
  4. Sen. Alex Padilla forcibly removed from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's ...
  5. Senator forcibly removed from DHS Secretary Noem's press ...
  6. Alex Padilla forcibly removed after interrupting Kristi Noem's ...
  7. Video shows Sen. Alex Padilla forcibly removed from DHS ...
  8. Democratic US Senator Padilla forced to ground, handcuffed by federal ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

šŸ’” Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
āœ“100% Free
āœ“No Registration
āœ“Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

šŸ”
Partially True
šŸŽÆ Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more ā†’
Fact Check: Thom Tillis has served as a U.S. senator since 2015.
True
šŸŽÆ Similar

Fact Check: Thom Tillis has served as a U.S. senator since 2015.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Thom Tillis has served as a U.S. senator since 2015.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more ā†’
Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis will not seek reelection after opposing the bill.
True
šŸŽÆ Similar

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis will not seek reelection after opposing the bill.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis will not seek reelection after opposing the bill.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more ā†’
šŸ”
True

Fact Check: Trump risks his presidency by humiliating his own senator.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump risks his presidency by humiliating his own senator.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more ā†’
Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis opposes the bill, citing billions in healthcare losses for North Carolina.
True

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis opposes the bill, citing billions in healthcare losses for North Carolina.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis opposes the bill, citing billions in healthcare losses for North Carolina.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more ā†’
Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis announces he won't seek reelection after Trump attacks!
True

Fact Check: Senator Thom Tillis announces he won't seek reelection after Trump attacks!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Thom Tillis announces he won't seek reelection after Trump attacks!

Jun 30, 2025
Read more ā†’
Explore All Fact Checks