Fact Check: Senate Democrats Force 10-Hour Reading of 940-Page Bill
What We Know
On June 28, 2025, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer announced that Democrats would force a full reading of a 940-page bill proposed by Senate Republicans. Schumer emphasized the importance of transparency, stating that if Republicans would not disclose the contents of the bill, Democrats would ensure it was read aloud in its entirety on the Senate floor (Reuters, Senate Democratic Caucus). This reading is expected to take approximately 10 hours, a tactic that has been used in the past by both parties to delay legislative proceedings (Politico).
Analysis
The claim that Senate Democrats will force a 10-hour reading of the 940-page bill is substantiated by multiple credible sources. Schumer's remarks, as reported by Reuters and Politico, confirm that the reading is a strategic move to highlight the bill's contents and to slow down the legislative process. This tactic is not new; it has been employed by both parties in the past to draw attention to specific legislation and to ensure that all senators are aware of what is being voted on.
The reliability of the sources is high. Reuters and Politico are well-respected news organizations known for their political reporting, and the official remarks from the Senate Democratic Caucus provide direct insight into the party's strategy. The context of the reading is also significant; it reflects ongoing partisan tensions where transparency and accountability are at the forefront of legislative discussions.
However, it is important to note that while the reading is expected to take about 10 hours, the actual time could vary based on procedural factors and the pace of the reading. The Democratic strategy aims to ensure that the public and Senate members are fully aware of the bill's provisions, which Schumer criticized as being rushed through Congress (Senate Democratic Caucus).
Conclusion
The claim that Senate Democrats are forcing a 10-hour reading of a 940-page bill is True. The evidence from multiple reliable sources confirms that this action is being taken as part of a broader strategy to promote transparency and accountability in the legislative process. The reading serves both as a procedural tactic and a means to engage the public in the legislative debate.
