Fact Check: Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, expressed on May 30, 2023, that she expected the bond provision to be removed from the Senate-approved bill by the parliamentarian.

Fact Check: "Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, expressed on May 30, 2023, that she expected the bond provision to be removed from the Senate-approved bill by the parliamentarian."

What We Know

On May 30, 2023, Senator Joni Ernst, a Republican from Iowa, made a statement regarding a bond provision in a Senate-approved bill. She indicated her expectation that this provision would be removed by the parliamentarian, who is responsible for ensuring that legislation complies with Senate rules. This claim was reported by various news outlets, including USA Today, which noted that Ernst specifically mentioned, "the bond provision 'will not be' in the Senate-approved bill because she expected it to be removed by the parliamentarian under a rule requiring everything to be germane to the bill."

Analysis

The claim made by Senator Ernst appears to be substantiated by the reporting from credible news sources. The statement was covered in detail by USA Today, which is a well-established news organization known for its journalistic standards. The context of her statement relates to the procedural rules of the Senate, where the parliamentarian plays a crucial role in determining what can be included in budget reconciliation bills.

However, while the statement itself is reported accurately, the broader implications of the bond provision's removal and its potential impact on the legislation remain unclear. The expectation of removal by the parliamentarian is a procedural matter and does not guarantee that the provision will indeed be removed, as the final decision rests with the parliamentarian's interpretation of Senate rules.

Additionally, the reliability of the source reporting the claim is important to consider. USA Today is generally regarded as a credible source, but it is essential to cross-reference with other reports and statements from the senator's office or other legislative documents to fully understand the context and implications of Ernst's statement.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While Senator Joni Ernst's statement about the bond provision is reported accurately, further investigation is required to confirm the outcome of the parliamentarian's decision and the implications for the legislation. The procedural nature of the claim necessitates a deeper understanding of Senate rules and the specific context of the bond provision within the larger legislative framework.