TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: SCOOP: The new house @KamalaHarris has just purchased in Brentwood, CA across from OJ Simpson's old house is worth over $30 million. It's on a double lot and it has a canyon view and a massive gate and wall (how ironic for the Border Czar LOL).

Fact Check: SCOOP: The new house @KamalaHarris has just purchased in Brentwood, CA across from OJ Simpson's old house is worth over $30 million. It's on a double lot and it has a canyon view and a massive gate and wall (how ironic for the Border Czar LOL).

Published July 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact-Check: Kamala Harris's Alleged $30 Million Mansion Purchase ## What We Know The claim that Kamala Harris has purchased a new house in Brentwoo...

Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Fact-Check: Kamala Harris's Alleged $30 Million Mansion Purchase

What We Know

The claim that Kamala Harris has purchased a new house in Brentwood, CA, worth over $30 million, originated from a tweet by right-wing activist Laura Loomer. In her post, Loomer stated that Harris was moving into a "new multi-million dollar mansion" near O.J. Simpson's old property, questioning how Harris could afford such a purchase given her campaign's reported debt (Hindustan Times, News18).

However, credible sources indicate that Kamala Harris's primary residence in Brentwood is valued at approximately $5 million, not $30 million. This home, purchased by her husband Doug Emhoff in 2012, is described as a modern 3,500-square-foot property with four bedrooms and five bathrooms (This Old House, Hello Magazine).

Analysis

The claim of a $30 million mansion seems to stem from misinformation and speculation rather than verified facts. The sources supporting Loomer's assertion are primarily social media posts and right-wing commentary, which often lack rigorous fact-checking and may carry inherent biases. For instance, Loomer's tweet gained traction among her followers but does not provide any concrete evidence or credible sources to substantiate the claim.

In contrast, reputable articles from sources like This Old House and Hello Magazine clearly state that Harris's home is valued at around $5 million. These sources provide a detailed description of the property and its features, reinforcing the credibility of their information.

Furthermore, the context of Loomer's claim—questioning Harris's financial status post-campaign—suggests a politically motivated narrative rather than an objective report on her real estate transactions.

Conclusion

The claim that Kamala Harris has purchased a mansion worth over $30 million in Brentwood, CA, is False. The evidence points to her existing home being valued at approximately $5 million, with no credible sources confirming the existence of a new, significantly more expensive property. The narrative surrounding the claim appears to be driven by speculation and political bias rather than factual reporting.

Sources

  1. Kamala Harris buys a multi-million dollar mansion in ...
  2. Kamala Harris Buys Multi-Million Dollar Mansion In ...
  3. $5 Million Kamala Harris House in Brentwood, California
  4. Inside Kamala Harris' $5m Brentwood home that neighbors ...
  5. Kamala Harris buys a multi-million dollar mansion in ...
  6. Dolly on X: "KAMALA HARRIS'S NEW HOME HAS A HUGE ...
  7. Kamala Harris Reportedly Has Some Ridiculously Famous ...
  8. Joyreaper on X: "KAMALA HARRIS' 30 MILLION DOLLAR ...
Advertisement
NordVPN - Explore the internet securely and privately

Secure your internet browsing withNordVPN's trusted protection

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: SCOOP: The new house @KamalaHarris has just purchased in Brentwood, CA across from OJ Simpson's old house is worth over $30 million. It's on a double lot and it has a canyon view and a massive gate and wall (how ironic for the Border Czar LOL).
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: SCOOP: The new house @KamalaHarris has just purchased in Brentwood, CA across from OJ Simpson's old house is worth over $30 million. It's on a double lot and it has a canyon view and a massive gate and wall (how ironic for the Border Czar LOL).

Detailed fact-check analysis of: SCOOP: The new house @KamalaHarris has just purchased in Brentwood, CA across from OJ Simpson's old house is worth over $30 million. It's on a double lot and it has a canyon view and a massive gate and wall (how ironic for the Border Czar LOL).

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Some insane breaking news coming out of the White House as we are now learning that President Joe Biden 73 days between his transition of him leaving office and President Donald Trump becoming president there was a discrepancy in which they actually gave out over $73 billion dollars in loans to small and medium businesses. However, they can't find the list of who they gave the money to. They are now doing congressional hearings on what happened to the money whether or not the money was actually ever given to any 00:32 small or medium businesses. Of course, Joe Biden had no comment as he doesn't recall any of those situations going at the time and now is admitted that his staff was using an auto pen in order for them to sign whatever they need from him in order to move forward and that these loans were likely a part of that auto pen

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b
Partially True

Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Indiana’s Camp Atterbury and New Jersey’s Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst will be used to house illegal immigrants before their deportation
True

Fact Check: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Indiana’s Camp Atterbury and New Jersey’s Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst will be used to house illegal immigrants before their deportation

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that Indiana’s Camp Atterbury and New Jersey’s Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst will be used to house illegal immigrants before their deportation

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.
True

Fact Check: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's New Strategy on Epstein Fallout: Blame the Democrats President Trump said the outrage among his supporters over the Epstein case was just the latest "scam" cooked up by Democrats.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: SCOOP: The new house @KamalaHarris has just purchased in Brentwood, CA across from OJ Simpson's old house is worth over $30 million. It's on a double lot and it has a canyon view and a massive gate and wall (how ironic for the Border Czar LOL). | TruthOrFake Blog