Fact Check: Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo will forgive each other

Fact Check: Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo will forgive each other

June 2, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Claim Analysis: "Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo Will Forgive Each Other" ## 1. Introduction The claim that "Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodr...

Claim Analysis: "Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo Will Forgive Each Other"

1. Introduction

The claim that "Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo will forgive each other" arises from recent public appearances and interactions between the two young pop stars. This assertion suggests a resolution to a long-standing feud that has been a topic of speculation among fans and media alike, particularly following their interactions at various events in late 2023 and early 2025.

2. What We Know

The relationship between Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo has been scrutinized since the release of Rodrigo's hit song "drivers license" in early 2021, which many fans speculated was about Carpenter due to their connections with actor Joshua Bassett. Over the years, both artists have been linked to various rumors and narratives surrounding their relationship.

  1. Public Appearances: Both artists were seen together at the 2023 Variety Hitmakers Brunch, where they posed for a photo, signaling a potential end to the feud rumors 2. Additionally, they were spotted hugging at the 2025 Grammys, further fueling speculation that they have reconciled 110.

  2. Media Coverage: Various media outlets have reported on the evolving dynamic between the two. For instance, Music Times noted that no official statements from either party's representatives have confirmed a feud, suggesting that much of the narrative has been driven by fan speculation rather than concrete evidence 5.

  3. Historical Context: The perceived feud began with the release of "drivers license," and Carpenter's subsequent song "Skin" was interpreted by many as a response to Rodrigo's lyrics 9. However, both artists have since expressed that they have moved on from any past tensions, with Carpenter stating in interviews that she does not wish to engage in any negativity 6.

3. Analysis

The claim of forgiveness between Carpenter and Rodrigo is supported by their recent public interactions, but it is essential to critically evaluate the sources and the context of these events.

  • Source Reliability: The sources reporting on this claim vary in credibility. J-14 and Music Times are entertainment news outlets that often cover celebrity gossip and may have a tendency to sensationalize events for clicks 15. In contrast, more established outlets like People and Elite Daily provide a broader context and seem to report on the events with a degree of professionalism 910.

  • Potential Bias: Some sources may have an inherent bias towards creating drama to attract readership. For example, the narrative surrounding their feud has been heavily influenced by fan interpretations and social media speculation, which can often exaggerate or misrepresent the reality of celebrity relationships 6.

  • Methodological Concerns: Much of the information about the feud and subsequent reconciliation is anecdotal, based on public appearances and social media interactions rather than direct statements from the artists themselves. This reliance on observation rather than confirmed statements raises questions about the accuracy of the claims regarding their relationship status.

  • Conflicting Narratives: While some sources suggest that the two have reconciled, others maintain that the feud was largely a fabrication of fan speculation and media hype 58. This discrepancy highlights the need for caution when interpreting the nature of their relationship.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that "Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo will forgive each other" is partially true based on recent public interactions that suggest a thawing of their previously contentious relationship. Evidence from their appearances together at events, such as the 2023 Variety Hitmakers Brunch and the 2025 Grammys, indicates a potential reconciliation. However, it is crucial to note that these interactions do not constitute a formal acknowledgment of forgiveness or a definitive end to any past tensions.

The context surrounding their relationship is complex, heavily influenced by fan speculation and media narratives rather than direct statements from the artists themselves. While both have indicated a desire to move on from any negativity, the lack of official confirmation leaves room for interpretation and uncertainty.

Moreover, the evidence available is largely anecdotal and derived from public appearances, which may not accurately reflect their private sentiments. Therefore, while there are signs of a more amicable relationship, the claim cannot be fully substantiated without clearer communication from Carpenter and Rodrigo themselves.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding celebrity relationships, as narratives can often be shaped by speculation and sensationalism.

5. Sources

  1. J-14. Are Sabrina Carpenter, Olivia Rodrigo Friends? Feud Explainer. Retrieved from J-14
  2. Champagne and Shade. After two years, Olivia Rodrigo ended rumors about this feud. Retrieved from Champagne and Shade
  3. StyleCaster. What Happened With Sabrina Carpenter & Olivia Rodrigo? Retrieved from StyleCaster
  4. YouTube. Chronically online girl explains Sabrina Carpenter, Olivia Rodrigo, & Joshua Bassett lore. Retrieved from YouTube
  5. Music Times. Olivia Rodrigo, Sabrina Carpenter End Long-Standing Feud? Retrieved from Music Times
  6. Her Campus. Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter Hug It Out After Sweet and Sour. Retrieved from Her Campus
  7. Yahoo Entertainment. Is Sabrina Carpenter the Reason for Taylor Swift and Olivia Rodrigo's Feud? Retrieved from Yahoo
  8. IMDb. Olivia Rodrigo & Sabrina Carpenter Shut Down Feud Rumors 2 Years After. Retrieved from IMDb
  9. People. Sabrina Carpenter Addresses Olivia Rodrigo Drama on "Skin". Retrieved from People
  10. Elite Daily. Sabrina Carpenter & Olivia Rodrigo's Grammys Moment Ends Feud Rumors. Retrieved from Elite Daily

Got your own claim to verify? It's 100% Free!

Join thousands who trust our AI-powered fact-checking. Completely free with no registration required. Your claim could be the next important truth we uncover.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Are Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter friends?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter friends?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Olivia Rodrigo and Sabrina Carpenter friends?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: It is all about 1948. It's not about October 7, 1956, 1967, 1982, 2008, 2014 or any other date on which Israel committed egregious atrocities in and around Palestine; it's all about 1948, and it's important to remember this date well. The war and the complete failure of all attempts to achieve a viable peace have pushed Palestine back to this date. The 76 years that have passed have been a fruitless struggle for 'peace'. All they have done is give Israel four decades to reinforce its total control over Palestine. This is all about history. Understanding the struggle for Palestine requires understanding its historical context. The modern history commences with Britain using the Zionists, while simultaneously being utilized by them, to establish an imperial foothold in the Middle East, effectively transforming Israel into the central pillar of a bridge from Egypt and the Nile to Iraq, its oil, and the Gulf. The calculations were devoid of morality, driven solely by self-interest. Britain had no right to cede a portion of the area it was occupying—Palestine—to another occupier, and the UN similarly lacked the authority to do so. The 1947 General Assembly partition resolution was essentially a US resolution anyway; the numbers were fixed by the White House once it became clear that it would fail. Chaim Weizmann, the prominent Zionist leader in London and Washington, requested Truman's intervention. “I am aware of how much abstaining delegations would be swayed by your counsel and the influence of your government,” he informed the president. “I refer to China, Honduras, Colombia, Mexico, Liberia, Ethiopia, Greece. I beg and pray for your decisive intervention at this decisive hour.” Among the countries that needed a push were the Philippines, Cuba, Haiti, and France. “We went for it," stated Clark Clifford, Truman’s special counsel, subsequently. “It was because the White House was for it that it went through. I kept the ramrod up the State Department’s butt.” Herschel Johnson, the deputy chief of the US mission at the UN, cried in frustration while speaking to Loy Henderson, a senior diplomat and head of the State Department’s Office of Near Eastern Affairs, who was a staunch adversary of the construction of a Zionist settler state in Palestine. “Loy, forgive me for breaking down like this,” Johnson stated, “but Dave Niles called us here a couple of days ago and said that the president had instructed him to tell us that, by God, he wanted us to get busy and get all the votes that we possibly could, that there would be hell if the voting went the other way.” In September, UNSCOP (the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine) convened an ad hoc committee to evaluate its proposals. The committee consisted of all members of the General Assembly, with subcommittees designated to evaluate the suggestions presented. On November 25, the General Assembly, acting as an ad hoc committee, approved partition with a vote of 25 in favor, 13 against, and 17 abstentions. A two-thirds majority was required for the partition resolution to succeed in the General Assembly plenary session four days later, indicating its impending failure. However, following the White House's endorsement, seven of the 17 abstainers from November 25 voted 'yes' on November 29, resulting in the passage of Resolution 181 (II) with 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and 10 abstentions. Niles, the Zionists' ‘point man’ at the White House, subsequently partnered with Clark Clifford to undermine the State Department's proposal to replace partition with trusteeship for the time being because of the violence threatened in Palestine. Niles was the first member of a series of Zionist lobbyists sent to monitor the presidency from within. Despite their unpopularity and potential resentment, the presidents had no choice but to tolerate their persistent pressure. During John Kennedy's administration, Mike (Myer) Feldman was permitted to oversee all State Department and White House cable concerning the Middle East. Despite internal opposition within the White House, Kennedy perceived Feldman “as a necessary evil whose highly visible White House position was a political debt that had to be paid,” as noted by Seymour Hersh in The Samson Option. Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (p. 98). Lyndon Johnson took over Feldman after Kennedy's assassination, granting Israel all its demands without offering anything in return. The transfer of Palestine to a recent settler minority contravened fundamental UN norms, including the right to self-determination. Resistance to Zionism and the formation of a Jewish state in Palestine were significant within the US administration, but it was the man in the White House, influenced by domestic interests (money and votes), who called the shots and has been calling them ever since. Palestine went from British control to American hands, and then to the Zionists. 29 November 1947 - partition plans. 33 voted for, 13 voted against, 10 abstained The desires of the Palestinians were irrelevant to the 'return' of the Jewish people to their ''ancient homeland'', as noted by Arthur Balfour. The fact that Jews could not 'return’ to a land in which they or their ancestors had never lived was equally immaterial. What went on behind closed doors to ensure the establishment of a colonial-settler state in Palestine, contrary to the desires of its populace, represents but one episode in a protracted history of duplicity, deceit, persistent breaches of international law, and violations of fundamental UN principles. The so-called "Palestine problem" has never been a "Palestine problem," but rather a Western and Zionist problem—a volatile combination of the two that the perpetrators are still blaming on their victims. There would be no ambiguity regarding our current situation at the precipice if Western governments and the media held Israel accountable rather than shielding, endorsing, and rationalizing even the most egregious offenses under the pretext of Israel's 'right' to self-defense. It is absurd to propose that a thief has any form of 'right' to 'defend' stolen property. The right belongs to the person fighting for its return, as the Palestinians have been doing daily since 1948. Aside from the 5–6% of land acquired by Zionist purchasing agencies before 1948, Israelis are living on and in stolen property. They will defend it, but they have no 'right' to defend something that, by any legal, moral, historical, or cultural measure, belongs to someone else. This has never been a 'conflict of rights' as 'liberal' Zionists have claimed, because a right is a right and cannot conflict with another right. The real rights in this context are evident, or would be, if they were not persistently suppressed by Western governments and a media that unconditionally safeguards Israel's actions. Although the non-binding UNGA partition resolution of that year did not include a 'transfer' of the Palestinian population, the creation of a Jewish state would have been more challenging without it. Without the expulsion of indigenous Palestinians, the demographic composition of the 'Jewish state' would have included an equal number of Palestinian Muslims and Christians alongside Jews. War was the sole means of getting rid of Palestinian natives; raw force achieved what Theodor Herzl envisioned when he referred to “spiriting” the “penniless population” from their land. Upon its completion, Weizmann expressed excitement regarding this "miraculous simplification of our task." Following 1948, there were massacres in the West Bank, Gaza, and Jordan; massacres in Lebanon; and wars and assassinations throughout the region and beyond. A second wave of ethnic cleansing succeeded the 1948 one in 1967, and now a third and fourth wave is taking place in Gaza and southern Lebanon, terrorizing and slaughtering town dwellers and villagers into fleeing. https://preview.redd.it/orxl88k6mfoe1.jpg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=12103a2b560e3af2f72c656e6e39fdbea64caa11 Western governments and the media are facilitating the gradual, covert, illegal, and pseudo-legal erosion of Palestinian life and rights in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It is remarkable how the media constantly discusses October 7 but never talks about any of this critical history. Of course, as an accomplice to one of the biggest crimes of the 20th century, meticulously orchestrated and executed violently, discussing it candidly would entail self-incrimination; thus, it diverts the discourse to alternative subjects—''Hamas terrorism'', ''October 7''—anything to distract from Israel's egregious war crimes. This distortion of the narrative has persisted since the PLO and the popular fronts of the 1960s were labeled as terrorists, while Israel was portrayed as a plucky small state merely defending itself. The Poles, the French, and other Europeans opposed the Nazi occupation. The distinction is clear: resistance to occupation by Palestinians is labeled as terrorism, while state-sponsored terrorism is characterized as 'self-defense.' This distortion of truth has been outrageously amplified following the pager/walkie-talkie terrorist acts perpetrated by Israel in Lebanon. Western governments and their connected media entities have rationalized and even lauded them. The Palestinians demonstrated their readiness to transcend the events of 1948 and to make significant concessions for peace —22 percent of the land in exchange for relinquishing 78 percent—provided Israel would engage sincerely with the rights of the 1948 generation; nevertheless, Israel ignored their offers contemptuously. The Palestinians were willing to share Jerusalem, but Israel was not receptive to this proposition. It had consistently desired all of Palestine. The Netanyahu government, seeing no need for such concealment, now unveils the truth that the 1990s 'peace process' and previous proposals from various diplomatic entities obscured. It explicitly states its desires, regardless of the opinions of others, including former partners, which align with the initial aspirations of the Zionist movement: all of Palestine, ideally devoid of Palestinians. Israel's refusal to cede any portion of Palestine has blurred the distinctions between the pre- and post-1967 eras. There are no delineating green lines between occupied and unoccupied territories, only the red lines that Israel transgresses daily. Deprived of even a small portion of their homeland, Palestinians and their supporters are compelled to resort to resistance and are resolute in their pursuit of reclaiming all of 1948 Palestine, rather than merely the limited fraction they previously would have accepted. Western countries facilitate and even promote Israel's existence outside international law by providing arms and financial assistance. Israel's occupation, massacres, and assassinations occur because of Western governments' tacit approval and encouragement. If Israel commits genocide, it is due to Western nations' acquiescence and implicit endorsement. If Israel is condemning itself to endless war with those whose fundamental rights it has infringed upon for the past 76 years, it is due to Western governments' acceptance. They have allowed Israel to push the world to the brink of regional and even global conflict. Israel is chaotic, yet it has never been orderly. The West has also permitted this, and it will face consequences.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: It is all about 1948. It's not about October 7, 1956, 1967, 1982, 2008, 2014 or any other date on wh...

Mar 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift are no longer friends
Mostly False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift are no longer friends

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift are no longer friends

Jun 2, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: s a result of Chávez's policies, Venezuela reached a 98% literacy rate, which is slightly above the average of Latin America.[3] Life expectancy is one of the lowest of the continent, along with the poorest countries in the region, like Bolivia and Haiti[4] and, despite official propaganda, the country is also the third most violent in the region.[5][6] When oil prices started to fall in around 2014, the Venezuelan economy began a serious decline, with inflation rates over 100,000%[7], a GDP drop of 75%[8] and three in four living in extreme poverty.[9] According to apologists, this happened because the price of oil tanked. However, other countries that rely so much on this single commodity didn't face such a serious crisis since 2013 (though this could also be because many of those countries aren't subject to the same levels of international isolation or US sanctions, or any at all;[10] see Saudi Arabia, for example).

Detailed fact-check analysis of: s a result of Chávez's policies, Venezuela reached a 98% literacy rate, which is slightly above the ...

Mar 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Sabrina and Barry still together?
False

Fact Check: Are Sabrina and Barry still together?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Sabrina and Barry still together?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are Sydney and Olivia dating?
Unverified

Fact Check: Are Sydney and Olivia dating?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are Sydney and Olivia dating?

May 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo will forgive each other | TruthOrFake Blog