Fact Check: Restoring lost American soft power will be costly and challenging.

Fact Check: Restoring lost American soft power will be costly and challenging.

Published June 21, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Restoring lost American soft power will be costly and challenging." ## What We Know The claim that restoring lost American soft power ...

Fact Check: "Restoring lost American soft power will be costly and challenging."

What We Know

The claim that restoring lost American soft power will be costly and challenging is supported by various analyses of the implications surrounding the closure of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). USAID has historically been a cornerstone of American soft power, providing development assistance and humanitarian aid globally. In 2023 alone, USAID disbursed approximately $43.79 billion and assisted around 130 countries, fostering goodwill and long-term relationships that enhance U.S. influence abroad (Diplo).

The Trump administration's decision to dissolve USAID has raised concerns about the future of U.S. diplomacy and its ability to influence global affairs through non-coercive means. Analysts suggest that without USAID's programs, the U.S. risks losing a vital instrument of soft power, which could lead to increased challenges in international relations and allow other nations, particularly China, to fill the void left by the U.S. (Diplo).

Furthermore, the closure of USAID could disrupt critical assistance programs, endangering vulnerable populations and undermining the U.S.'s standing as a leader in humanitarian aid (Diplo). This shift in policy reflects a broader trend towards prioritizing hard power over soft power, complicating the restoration of American influence on the global stage.

Analysis

The evidence presented indicates that the dissolution of USAID represents a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, with potential long-term repercussions for American soft power. The agency's role in fostering international relationships and promoting democratic governance has been crucial for maintaining U.S. influence. The closure of such a pivotal institution is likely to create a vacuum that rivals, particularly China, are eager to exploit (Diplo).

Critics of the Trump administration's approach argue that the focus on hard power strategies, while appealing in the short term, may ultimately weaken U.S. global standing and influence. For instance, a piece in the Washington Post emphasizes that relying solely on hard power will not suffice in the face of growing global challenges. The potential for other nations to step in and fill the soft power void left by the U.S. is a pressing concern, as countries like China and India are already positioning themselves as alternative leaders in global development and diplomacy (Diplo).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, with the primary source being a detailed examination from Diplo, which specializes in diplomatic policy analysis. The Washington Post, known for its rigorous journalism, also provides a reliable perspective on the implications of U.S. soft power strategies (Washington Post).

Conclusion

The claim that restoring lost American soft power will be costly and challenging is True. The closure of USAID signifies a critical juncture in U.S. foreign policy that threatens to diminish American influence globally. The potential loss of soft power resources and the ability to engage in effective diplomacy will likely require significant investment and strategic rethinking to restore the U.S.'s position on the world stage.

Sources

  1. The USAID's closure: Soft power at a crossroads - Diplo
  2. The State of American Diplomacy in 2023
  3. Temporada 2022 de Fórmula 1 - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
  4. Trump is liquidating America's reserves of soft power
  5. Soft Power Isn't Charity—It's Strategy. So Why Are We ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Department of the Interior is asking the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S. Department of the Interior is asking the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Department of the Interior is asking the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Department of Interior is asking the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S. Department of Interior is asking the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Department of Interior is asking the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Department of Interior has instructed the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'
Partially True

Fact Check: The U.S. Department of Interior has instructed the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Department of Interior has instructed the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. Department of the Interior has instructed the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'
Partially True

Fact Check: The U.S. Department of the Interior has instructed the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. Department of the Interior has instructed the public to report National Park Service employees for making disparaging remarks about Americans or failing to praise natural attributes, as part of an initiative stemming from President Donald Trump's executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.'

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The new rules at the VA were made to comply with Trump's executive order titled 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government', which primarily aimed to strip protections from transgender individuals.
True

Fact Check: The new rules at the VA were made to comply with Trump's executive order titled 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government', which primarily aimed to strip protections from transgender individuals.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The new rules at the VA were made to comply with Trump's executive order titled 'Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government', which primarily aimed to strip protections from transgender individuals.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →