Fact Check: Resistance Movements Are Rising Up Against Authoritarianism's Horrors
What We Know
The claim that "resistance movements are rising up against authoritarianism's horrors" is supported by various recent analyses and historical examples. In a New York Times essay, political scientists Steven Levitsky, Lucan Way, and Daniel Ziblatt argue that the U.S. has entered a phase of competitive authoritarianism, where elections exist but dissent is heavily suppressed. They emphasize the importance of civic engagement and collective action in resisting authoritarian regimes.
Historically, successful pro-democracy movements, such as the U.S. civil rights movement, the Polish Solidarity movement, and the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa, have demonstrated the effectiveness of broad-based democratic fronts and sustained mass participation (source-4). More recent examples include civic uprisings in Brazil, South Korea, and Serbia, where diverse groups united to challenge autocratic leaders and policies (source-4).
Research indicates that civil resistance movements significantly increase the likelihood of halting democratic backsliding. According to studies by political scientists Jonathan Pinckney and Claire Trilling, the probability of stopping democratic decline rises from 7.5% to 51.7% when populations engage in civil resistance, which includes protests, boycotts, and strikes (source-4).
Analysis
The evidence supporting the claim is robust, drawing from both historical and contemporary examples of successful resistance against authoritarianism. The authors of the New York Times essay provide a comprehensive overview of how collective action has historically been a powerful tool against oppressive regimes. Their analysis is grounded in well-documented historical events, making it a reliable source of information.
Moreover, the recent electoral victories in countries like Poland and Brazil illustrate a clear trend of resistance against authoritarianism. In Poland, the opposition coalition that defeated the Law and Justice Party in the 2023 elections mobilized diverse groups, including lawyers and youth movements, to challenge the government's authoritarian practices (source-6). Similarly, in Brazil, a broad coalition of businesses, unions, and civil society organizations played a crucial role in ousting President Jair Bolsonaro, who had attempted to undermine democratic norms (source-4).
While the sources cited are credible, it is essential to consider potential biases. The New York Times is generally regarded as a reputable outlet, but like all media, it may reflect certain ideological leanings. However, the use of empirical research and historical examples lends credibility to their arguments. The analysis from political scientists is also grounded in academic research, which typically undergoes rigorous peer review.
Conclusion
The claim that "resistance movements are rising up against authoritarianism's horrors" is True. The evidence presented from various credible sources highlights a significant trend of collective action and civic engagement in resisting authoritarian regimes both historically and in contemporary contexts. The successful mobilization of diverse groups against oppressive governance demonstrates that organized resistance can effectively challenge and overturn authoritarian practices.
