Fact Check: Republican Gov. Jeff Landry vows to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Fact Check: "Republican Gov. Jeff Landry vows to appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court."

What We Know

The claim regarding Republican Governor Jeff Landry's intention to appeal a ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court stems from ongoing legal proceedings involving the state of Louisiana. Specifically, Landry, in his capacity as the Attorney General, has been involved in multiple cases that have reached higher courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Recent documents indicate that there are ongoing appeals related to various legal matters, including a case involving the state's legislative actions and their implications on voting rights and election laws (source-1, source-2).

Landry's office has been actively involved in litigation that challenges various rulings, and he has expressed intentions to seek further judicial review from the Supreme Court in cases that impact state governance and legal interpretations (source-6).

Analysis

The credibility of the claim that Governor Jeff Landry intends to appeal a ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court is supported by recent legal filings and statements from his office. The documents from the Supreme Court indicate ongoing litigation involving Landry, particularly in relation to his role as Attorney General (source-1, source-2).

However, while there are indications of appeals being pursued, the specific claim that Landry "vows" to appeal may lack direct attribution to a public statement or a formal declaration. The language used in legal documents often reflects procedural intentions rather than personal vows. Additionally, the context of the appeal—whether it pertains to a specific ruling or a broader legal strategy—remains somewhat ambiguous, requiring further clarification from official sources or direct quotes from Landry himself (source-3, source-4).

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that Republican Gov. Jeff Landry vows to appeal a ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court is partially substantiated by ongoing legal proceedings and intentions expressed in court documents. However, the lack of a direct public statement or clear context regarding the specific ruling in question necessitates further investigation. More definitive evidence or a direct quote from Landry would strengthen the claim's credibility.

Sources

1. PDF No. 23A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
2. NO. 23A282
3. Court blocks La. law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms
4. PDF United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
5. PDF IN RE JEFF LANDRY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE - Supreme Court of ...
6. Supreme Court to hear appeal from Chevron in landmark Louisiana coastal ...
7. In Re: Jeff Landry, No. 23-30642 (5th Cir. 2023) :: Justia