Fact Check: Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization.

Fact Check: Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization.

Published July 2, 2025
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# Fact Check: "Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization." ## What We Know The claim that "Repsol was the original owner of YPF...

Fact Check: "Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization."

What We Know

The claim that "Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization" refers to the history of YPF (Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales), an Argentine oil company. YPF was founded in 1922 as a state-owned enterprise. It was the first national oil company in the world, created to manage the country's oil resources. In 1993, YPF was privatized, and Repsol, a Spanish multinational energy company, acquired a controlling stake in YPF in 1999. This privatization marked a significant shift in the ownership structure of YPF, transitioning from a state-owned entity to a privately held company under Repsol's control (source).

In 2012, the Argentine government nationalized YPF again, taking back control from Repsol. This move was controversial and led to significant diplomatic tensions between Argentina and Spain (source). Therefore, while Repsol did not originally own YPF, it became the controlling owner after the privatization in the late 1990s.

Analysis

The claim is misleading because it conflates the timeline of ownership. YPF was originally a state-owned company, and Repsol did not own it until after the privatization process. The privatization occurred in the 1990s, and Repsol's acquisition of YPF was part of a broader trend of privatization in Argentina during that period (source).

The reliability of the sources discussing YPF's history is generally high, as they are well-documented events in Argentina's economic history. However, the claim itself lacks nuance and fails to clarify that Repsol's ownership was not original but rather a result of privatization.

Additionally, the nationalization of YPF in 2012 was framed by the Argentine government as a reclaiming of national resources, which adds a layer of political context to the ownership history (source). This context is essential for understanding the implications of the claim.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified. The statement that "Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization" is misleading. While Repsol did become the controlling owner of YPF after its privatization in the late 1990s, it was not the original owner, as YPF was founded as a state-owned company in 1922. The claim lacks clarity and does not accurately represent the historical timeline of ownership.

Sources

  1. History of YPF and Repsol's acquisition
  2. Nationalization of YPF in 2012
  3. Privatization trends in Argentina
  4. Political context of YPF's nationalization

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Argentina seized a 51% stake in YPF from Repsol in 2012.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Argentina seized a 51% stake in YPF from Repsol in 2012.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Argentina seized a 51% stake in YPF from Repsol in 2012.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald Trump kept the original FIFA Club World Cup trophy in the Oval Office.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump kept the original FIFA Club World Cup trophy in the Oval Office.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The term 'dupe' refers to imitation products that resemble original brands.
Unverified

Fact Check: The term 'dupe' refers to imitation products that resemble original brands.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The term 'dupe' refers to imitation products that resemble original brands.

Jul 2, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Naturalized citizens in Taiwan must generally give up their original citizenship.
Unverified

Fact Check: Naturalized citizens in Taiwan must generally give up their original citizenship.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Naturalized citizens in Taiwan must generally give up their original citizenship.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump received the original gold trophy as a gift in the Oval Office.
False

Fact Check: Trump received the original gold trophy as a gift in the Oval Office.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump received the original gold trophy as a gift in the Oval Office.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Repsol was the original owner of YPF before its nationalization. | TruthOrFake Blog