Fact Check: "Rep. Swalwell takes out liability insurance amid Trump’s legal threats."
What We Know
The claim that Rep. Eric Swalwell has taken out liability insurance in response to legal threats from former President Donald Trump is currently unverified. While Swalwell has been vocal about his opposition to Trump and has faced numerous threats, including death threats, there is no direct evidence or credible report confirming that he has specifically taken out liability insurance due to these threats.
Swalwell has been involved in legal actions against Trump, including a lawsuit related to the January 6 Capitol riot, where he alleges that Trump incited violence against Congress members. This lawsuit is part of a broader context of legal challenges Trump faces, as noted in various reports on the pending criminal and civil cases against him.
Analysis
The sources available do not provide any concrete evidence supporting the claim about Swalwell obtaining liability insurance. The most relevant sources discuss Swalwell's legal actions against Trump and the threats he has received, but they do not mention any insurance policies. For instance, Swalwell's lawsuit against Trump highlights the risks he perceives from Trump's actions but does not indicate that he has taken out insurance as a protective measure (Washington Post, Just Security).
Additionally, the source discussing Swalwell's experiences with threats does not provide any information about insurance, focusing instead on the broader implications of his political stance and the personal risks he faces (Los Angeles Times).
Given the lack of direct evidence and the reliance on anecdotal reports regarding Swalwell's situation, the claim lacks substantiation.
Conclusion
Needs Research. The assertion that Rep. Swalwell has taken out liability insurance due to Trump’s legal threats is not supported by credible evidence. While Swalwell has faced significant threats and has engaged in legal actions against Trump, there is no confirmation of him obtaining liability insurance. Further investigation and reliable sources would be necessary to verify this claim.
