Fact Check: Removing over 11 million people from Medicaid could result in more than 100,000 deaths.

Fact Check: Removing over 11 million people from Medicaid could result in more than 100,000 deaths.

Published July 9, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Removing over 11 million people from Medicaid could result in more than 100,000 deaths." ## What We Know Recent research indicates tha...

Fact Check: "Removing over 11 million people from Medicaid could result in more than 100,000 deaths."

What We Know

Recent research indicates that proposed changes to Medicaid could lead to significant mortality rates. A letter from public health researchers at Yale University and the University of Pennsylvania warns that provisions in a House-passed federal budget reconciliation bill could result in over 51,000 preventable deaths annually if enacted. This estimate is based on the projected loss of coverage for approximately 7.7 million people, which could lead to an estimated 11,300 additional deaths due to lack of access to Medicaid or ACA Marketplace coverage (Yale School of Public Health).

The researchers also project that the disenrollment of 1.38 million low-income Medicare beneficiaries could increase mortality by 18,200 per year, while the elimination of nursing home staffing standards could lead to another 13,000 deaths annually. Additionally, the expiration of enhanced ACA Premium Tax Credits could push 5 million Americans into uninsurance, resulting in an estimated 8,811 more deaths each year (NBC News, Scientific American).

Analysis

The claim that removing over 11 million people from Medicaid could result in more than 100,000 deaths is partially true. While the specific figure of 100,000 deaths is not directly supported by the cited research, the total projected deaths from various proposed Medicaid cuts and changes is significant. The researchers' estimates total over 51,000 deaths, which is substantial but does not reach the 100,000 mark claimed.

The sources used for these estimates are credible, including peer-reviewed studies and expert opinions from recognized institutions. The Yale and University of Pennsylvania researchers utilized a methodology grounded in peer-reviewed literature that quantifies the relationship between insurance coverage, access to medications, and nursing home staffing levels with all-cause mortality (Yale School of Public Health). However, the extrapolation to a figure as high as 100,000 deaths appears to be an overestimate based on the available data.

Moreover, the reliability of the sources is high, as they come from reputable academic institutions and are supported by empirical data. However, it is essential to note that projections of mortality based on policy changes can vary widely depending on assumptions made in the modeling process (The Lancet).

Conclusion

The claim that removing over 11 million people from Medicaid could result in more than 100,000 deaths is partially true. While credible research indicates that significant mortality could result from proposed changes to Medicaid—totaling over 51,000 deaths annually—the specific figure of 100,000 deaths is not directly supported by the evidence. The estimates provided by researchers highlight serious public health concerns but should be interpreted with caution regarding their extrapolation to larger numbers.

Sources

  1. Proposed changes to Medicaid, other health programs could lead to over 51,000 preventable deaths, researchers warn. Yale School of Public Health
  2. Medicaid and Rural Health. MACPAC
  3. Proposed Medicaid cuts could lead to thousands of deaths. NBC News
  4. How Massive Medicaid Cuts Will Harm People's Health. Scientific American
  5. How Trump bill Medicaid cuts will impact U.S. health care. CNBC
  6. By the Numbers: House Bill Takes Health Coverage Away. CBPP
  7. Medicaid cuts, mortality, and health-care expenditure in the U.S. The Lancet
  8. Did the ACA Medicaid expansion save lives? ScienceDirect

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Business leaders and ex bank heads throw support behind Poilievre A number of prominent business leaders formally threw their support behind Pierre Poilievre in the upcoming federal election on Saturday, arguing his Conservative Party will best handle Canada’s slowing economic growth. The group of more than 30 current and past executives includes Fairfax Financial CEO Prem Watsa, Canaccord Genuity CEO Dan Daviau, former RBC Capital Markets CEO Anthony Fell and former Scotiabank CEO Brian Porter. They published an open letter in several Canadian newspapers on Saturday saying Poilievre's plans are best to get the country's economy "back on track." "Productivity has stalled. Economic growth has slowed. Our GDP per capita is shrinking," the letter reads. "Nevertheless, this decline is not inevitable -- and it's not the Canada we know and love." To turn things around, the letter said Canada needs to eliminate barriers to productivity by streamlining permit processes and cutting outdated regulations that prevent investment and job creation. It also said the government needs to be more disciplined with its spending, impose lower taxes to make Canada more competitive and develop the country's natural resources by building pipelines, expanding mining and investing in energy. The letter, which was also signed by former RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust founder Edward Sonshine, Mattamy Homes CEO Peter Gilgan and past Toronto Blue Jays president Paul Godfrey, is one of the strongest shows of support Poilievre has seen from the business community yet. His competitor, Liberal Mark Carney, has spent much of the election campaign, which concludes on April 28 when Canadians go to the polls, touting his experience as leader of the central banks in both Canada and England. He argues that experience leaves him best equipped to address the country's economic woes and tariff threats from U.S. President Donald Trump. The Liberals did not immediately respond to request for comment on the letter. The Conservatives, however, took the missive as a sign that their platform is resonating with the business community. “Pierre Poilievre’s Canada First Economic Action Plan is being recognized as a strong plan to lower taxes and eliminate red tape to unleash our industries and bring home powerful paycheques for our people and a thriving economy," Conservative spokesman Sam Lilly said in a statement. Poilievre revealed earlier this week that his plan is designed to cut bureaucratic red tape by 25 per cent in two years through a "two-for-one" law. The law would see two regulations be repealed for every new one that's enacted and require that every dollar spent on new administrative costs trigger the cutting of two dollars in other areas. Meanwhile, Carney has said he will boost interprovincial trade by removing all exemptions under the Canadian Free Trade Agreement, develop a new fund to help link natural resource extraction sites with rail lines and roads and create new programs geared toward training workers. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said it was "no surprise" some business leaders are backing Poilievre and Carney because they're giving a tax break to the ultra-wealthy," rather than focusing on "what people actually need—health care, housing, and support when they lose a job." "Canadians are working hard but falling behind," Singh said in a statement. "Wages aren’t keeping up, housing is out of reach, and public services are stretched. The economy isn’t working for most people." This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 12, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press

Apr 13, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Liberal government’s MPs backed a dangerous recommendation to strip churches of their charitable status, threatening the heart of our communities (House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21, Dec 2024: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/). Recommendation 430 proposes removing “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose, which could cost Canada’s 34,000 religious charities—40% of all charities—billions, end tax-deductible donations, and force many to close (B.C. Humanist Association, 2024: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends...). This would devastate vital services like food banks, shelters, and youth programs run by groups like the Salvation Army and local parishes. Don’t be fooled by last-minute Liberal denials. This election, your vote can protect the good work of religious charities that serve millions. On the eve of a day when people of all faiths unite in mourning, let’s stand together to preserve our sacred spaces. Vote to defend our churches! 🗳️ Sources: - House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/ - B.C. Humanist Association: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends... - Christianity Today, 2024: https://www.christianitytoday.com/.../canada-church... #SaveOurChurches #ProtectFaith #CommunityMatters See less

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Liberal government’s MPs backed a dangerous recommendation to strip churches of their charitable status, threatening the heart of our communities (House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21, Dec 2024: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/). Recommendation 430 proposes removing “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose, which could cost Canada’s 34,000 religious charities—40% of all charities—billions, end tax-deductible donations, and force many to close (B.C. Humanist Association, 2024: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends...). This would devastate vital services like food banks, shelters, and youth programs run by groups like the Salvation Army and local parishes. Don’t be fooled by last-minute Liberal denials. This election, your vote can protect the good work of religious charities that serve millions. On the eve of a day when people of all faiths unite in mourning, let’s stand together to preserve our sacred spaces. Vote to defend our churches! 🗳️ Sources: - House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/ - B.C. Humanist Association: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends... - Christianity Today, 2024: https://www.christianitytoday.com/.../canada-church... #SaveOurChurches #ProtectFaith #CommunityMatters See less

Apr 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Polls show that majorities oppose removing undocumented longtime residents, people with jobs, and those who don’t have a criminal record.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Polls show that majorities oppose removing undocumented longtime residents, people with jobs, and those who don’t have a criminal record.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Polls show that majorities oppose removing undocumented longtime residents, people with jobs, and those who don’t have a criminal record.

Jun 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Removing the tax on solar and wind projects will not increase electric bills.
Partially True

Fact Check: Removing the tax on solar and wind projects will not increase electric bills.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Removing the tax on solar and wind projects will not increase electric bills.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Removing fossil fuel subsidies could cut emissions by 10% by 2030.
Partially True

Fact Check: Removing fossil fuel subsidies could cut emissions by 10% by 2030.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Removing fossil fuel subsidies could cut emissions by 10% by 2030.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Attorney General claims removing life support isn't terminating a pregnancy
Partially True

Fact Check: Attorney General claims removing life support isn't terminating a pregnancy

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Attorney General claims removing life support isn't terminating a pregnancy

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →