Fact Check: Progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption.

Fact Check: Progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption.

Published June 28, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption." ## What We Know The claim that "progres...

Fact Check: "Progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption."

What We Know

The claim that "progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption" is supported by a variety of studies indicating a correlation between smartphone use and declining mental health, particularly among girls. According to a review by Abi-Jaoude et al. (2020), there is substantial evidence linking smartphone and social media use to increased mental distress, self-injurious behavior, and suicidality among youth, with the effects being most pronounced in girls (source-1).

In Ontario, the proportion of teenagers reporting moderate to serious mental distress rose from 24% in 2013 to 39% in 2017, coinciding with increased smartphone usage (source-1). Furthermore, a longitudinal study from South Korea found that longer smartphone use was associated with increased depressive symptoms and higher suicidal ideation specifically for girls, but not for boys (source-2).

Analysis

The evidence presented in the studies is compelling. The longitudinal data from South Korea indicates a causal relationship between smartphone use and mental health issues in girls, suggesting that the nature of smartphone interactions may exacerbate existing vulnerabilities (source-2). Additionally, the review by Abi-Jaoude et al. highlights a dose-response relationship, where increased smartphone and social media use correlates with worsening mental health outcomes, particularly in girls (source-1).

However, it is important to note that while the studies provide strong correlations, establishing direct causality is challenging due to the observational nature of much of the data. Critics argue that other factors, such as societal changes and increased pressure on youth, may also contribute to the observed mental health decline (source-5). Nonetheless, the consistent findings across multiple studies lend credibility to the assertion that smartphone adoption has played a significant role in the mental health decline among girls.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that "progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption" is substantiated by a range of studies indicating a significant correlation between smartphone use and deteriorating mental health, particularly among girls. The evidence suggests that the unique pressures and interactions facilitated by smartphones and social media may disproportionately affect girls, leading to increased rates of mental distress and suicidal ideation.

Sources

  1. Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health
  2. Smartphone use, gender, and adolescent mental health
  3. End the Phone-Based Childhood Now

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
911 was a false flag. For the
first 10 years, I did not think
anything other than the
official narrative then after
being shown a video, a close up
video of building number seven
coming down and that got me
going because it's obvious to
me that building seven was was
a controlled demolition because
the building collapses from the
bottom down. The trade centers
were unique in that they were
designed to withstand the
00:33
impact of a a a jet. From what
I understand the the outer
skeleton of the building. The
outer columns was like a a fish
net and you had these inner
core columns which was
substantial thick steel beams
to withstand four or five times
what the loads were. Got it.
The engineers always over
design a building. No steel
frame building has ever
collapsed before or since 9/
eleven. So that should say
something right there. And it
said that building seven it was
01:05
aggressive collapse that it was
caused by fire but progressive
collapse unlike the twin
towers, the twin towers
collapse from the top down.
That's a progressive collapse.
Sure. Floor by floor by floor.
But if you look at the videos
of building seven collapsing,
it collapses uniformly, it's
collapsing from the bottom, the
building stays intact all the
way to the bottom of the ground
and you could see the sides
caving in on it. For a building
to collapse uniformly which the
video show all the load bearing
it would have to have failed
01:36
simultaneously. Now, fire
doesn't act like that. I came
across an analogy of the twin
towers and if you could
visualize cast iron stoves
stacked. One on top of each
other. The stoves up at the
top. Yes, there's fire and
they've been damaged but the
stoves on the bottom, they
haven't been damaged. Okay. So,
the structure underneath all of
that is intact. So, it's
impossible for a building to
collapse near free fall speed
and increase. Without a
02:07
controlled demolition. You're
running into the path of most
resistance. I something else is
going on. I don't believe that
it was just the planes or the
fires I think that and they
examine the dust and they found
what they call thermitic
material which is like a
explosive incendiary which was
in the dust samples and that's
documented. There were reports
of the buildings were
undergoing a extensive elevator
renovation in the two or three
years prior to all kinds of
02:40
workers they had access to the
the core the cores of the
building and on the day of the
attack the the elevator company
would not assist in the
operations of the elevators and
the elevator company was the
elevator company it
subsequently went out of
business and a couple of years
after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. has a federal income tax system that is progressive.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S. has a federal income tax system that is progressive.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. has a federal income tax system that is progressive.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. has a progressive income tax system.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S. has a progressive income tax system.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. has a progressive income tax system.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. has a federal income tax system based on progressive tax rates.
True

Fact Check: The U.S. has a federal income tax system based on progressive tax rates.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. has a federal income tax system based on progressive tax rates.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Mamdani endorsed by AOC and Bernie Sanders, boosting his progressive credentials.
True

Fact Check: Mamdani endorsed by AOC and Bernie Sanders, boosting his progressive credentials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Mamdani endorsed by AOC and Bernie Sanders, boosting his progressive credentials.

Jun 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Common Dreams relies on donations to continue progressive journalism.
True

Fact Check: Common Dreams relies on donations to continue progressive journalism.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Common Dreams relies on donations to continue progressive journalism.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Progressive girls experienced the first major mental health decline post-smartphone adoption. | TruthOrFake Blog