Fact Check: £91M already spent on HS2 bat structure—before completion!

Fact Check: £91M already spent on HS2 bat structure—before completion!

Published June 30, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "£91M already spent on HS2 bat structure—before completion!" ## What We Know The claim that £91 million has already been spent on a bat...

Fact Check: "£91M already spent on HS2 bat structure—before completion!"

What We Know

The claim that £91 million has already been spent on a bat structure for the HS2 project is supported by multiple sources. According to a report by New Civil Engineer, the Department for Transport (DfT) revealed that £91 million had been spent as of 2019 prices, which translates to approximately £117 million in current prices. This expenditure is part of the overall budget for a structure designed to protect Bechstein's bats, a rare species, from the impacts of high-speed trains on their habitat in ancient woodlands in Buckinghamshire. The total projected cost for this bat mitigation structure has been cited as being around £100 million, as stated by the chairman of HS2 Ltd, Sir John Thompson (BBC).

Analysis

The claim is partially true because while it accurately reflects the reported expenditure on the bat structure, it lacks context regarding the total projected costs and the ongoing nature of the project. The £91 million figure is indeed a significant amount already spent, but it is part of a larger budget that could reach £100 million or more, depending on various factors including planning and construction complexities (Rail Magazine, Daily Mail).

The sources reporting on this expenditure include reputable outlets such as the BBC and New Civil Engineer, which are known for their coverage of infrastructure and engineering topics. However, some sources, like the Daily Mail, may have a more sensationalist approach, which could affect the framing of the information. It is essential to consider the reliability of the sources when evaluating the claim. The BBC and New Civil Engineer provide a more balanced view, while the Daily Mail tends to emphasize the controversy surrounding HS2's costs, which could lead to potential bias in interpretation.

Moreover, the costs associated with the bat structure have been influenced by regulatory requirements and the need for environmental protection measures, which are increasingly critical in large infrastructure projects. The HS2 project has faced scrutiny over its budget and planning processes, with some officials describing the need for 8,276 separate consents as excessive (BBC, New Civil Engineer). This complexity contributes to the rising costs and delays in the project.

Conclusion

The claim that £91 million has already been spent on the HS2 bat structure is partially true. While the expenditure is accurate, it is essential to recognize that this figure is part of a larger budget that could exceed £100 million. Additionally, the ongoing nature of the project and the complexities involved in environmental protection measures play a significant role in the overall costs. Therefore, while the claim holds merit, it requires further context to fully understand the implications of the expenditure.

Sources

  1. Why does it cost £100m for HS2 to protect bats?
  2. HS2 "bat tunnel" costs broken down as claims price has ...
  3. HS2 Ltd spending more than £100m on bat 'shed', says ...
  4. HS2 boss says it was RIGHT to spend £100million on a ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...