Fact Check: Pakistan's government embarrassingly reverses support for Trump after Iran airstrikes.

Fact Check: Pakistan's Government Embarrassingly Reverses Support for Trump After Iran Airstrikes

What We Know

On June 22, 2025, Pakistan's government publicly praised U.S. President Donald Trump for his diplomatic efforts in de-escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, even recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize. This commendation came after a series of violent incidents in Kashmir that had heightened hostilities between the two nuclear-armed nations. However, less than 24 hours later, Pakistan condemned Trump's decision to bomb Iran, labeling the strikes as a "serious violation of international law" and expressing concern over the targeting of facilities under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (Reuters, Washington Post).

The abrupt shift in Pakistan's stance highlights the complexities of its foreign relations, particularly its close ties with Iran and its strategic interests in the region. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's condemnation of the airstrikes was communicated in a phone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, emphasizing Pakistan's support for Iran's right to self-defense against perceived aggressions (Euronews).

Analysis

The claim that Pakistan's government embarrassingly reversed its support for Trump is substantiated by the timeline of events. Initially, Pakistan's endorsement of Trump was framed as gratitude for his mediation efforts concerning Kashmir, which had been a significant point of contention. However, the immediate backlash following the Iran airstrikes indicates a rapid and stark change in diplomatic tone.

The sources reporting on this event are credible and provide a consistent narrative. For instance, both Reuters and The Washington Post are reputable news organizations known for their journalistic standards. They corroborate the timeline of events and the statements made by Pakistani officials. Furthermore, the Euronews report adds context by highlighting Pakistan's longstanding relationship with Iran, which adds depth to the analysis of Pakistan's foreign policy decisions.

However, it is essential to consider potential biases in reporting. While the mainstream media outlets provide factual accounts, the framing of Pakistan's actions as "embarrassing" may reflect a Western perspective on diplomatic relations that does not fully account for the complexities of regional politics. The term "embarrassing" suggests a moral judgment that may not align with the strategic calculations made by Pakistan's leadership.

Conclusion

The claim that Pakistan's government embarrassingly reversed its support for Trump after the Iran airstrikes is True. The evidence shows a clear and rapid shift in Pakistan's diplomatic stance, moving from praise for Trump to condemnation of his military actions against Iran within a single day. This incident underscores the intricate balance Pakistan must maintain in its foreign relations, particularly between its alliances with the U.S. and Iran.

Fact Check: Pakistan's government embarrassingly reverses support for Trump after Iran airstrikes.