Fact Check: Pakistan Violated Ceasefire Hours After Agreement with India
What We Know
On May 10, 2025, India and Pakistan announced a ceasefire agreement after several days of intense military conflict, which included drone strikes and missile attacks. This agreement was reportedly mediated by the United States, with President Trump announcing it on social media. Both Indian and Pakistani officials confirmed the ceasefire, although only Pakistan acknowledged the U.S. role in facilitating the agreement (source-1). However, within hours of the announcement, reports emerged of continued shelling along the border, particularly in the Kashmir region (source-1).
Vikram Misri, India's foreign secretary, accused Pakistan of breaking the ceasefire, stating there had been "repeated violations of the understanding arrived between the two countries today" (source-1). In response, Pakistan's foreign ministry asserted that it remained committed to the ceasefire and blamed India for initiating the violations, claiming that their forces were exercising restraint despite provocations (source-2).
Analysis
The claim that Pakistan violated the ceasefire shortly after the agreement is supported by multiple credible sources. India's foreign secretary explicitly stated that Pakistan breached the ceasefire agreement, indicating that there were violations occurring soon after the announcement (source-1). This assertion was echoed by reports from various news outlets, including NBC News, which noted that the ceasefire was allegedly violated by Pakistan shortly after it was declared (source-6).
Conversely, Pakistan's foreign ministry maintained that it was committed to the ceasefire and accused India of instigating the violations (source-2). This back-and-forth between the two nations is typical of their historical conflict, where both sides often blame each other for violations.
The reliability of the sources reporting on this incident is generally high, as they include established news organizations like The New York Times and Reuters, which have a track record of accurate reporting on international affairs. However, it is important to note that both countries have vested interests in portraying the narrative in a way that favors their position, which can introduce bias in the reporting.
Conclusion
The evidence indicates that Pakistan did violate the ceasefire agreement shortly after it was announced. India's foreign secretary's statements, along with corroborating reports from multiple credible sources, support this claim. While Pakistan has denied these allegations and pointed fingers at India, the immediate reports of continued hostilities suggest that the ceasefire was not upheld by Pakistan. Therefore, the verdict on the claim is True.
